Make it fit both (expanding tables, etc.)
If you design it for hi-res, low res users (majority) will have to scroll.
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!When designing a website, what rez is best. 800x600? 1024x768? What do most visitors surf in? I designed my latest site in 1024. When I visit it in 800...well you know what it looks like.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Sharpy
nosig @ this time
Make it fit both (expanding tables, etc.)
If you design it for hi-res, low res users (majority) will have to scroll.
NETCHEAP - Discount Dotster Reseller - $7.99
FREE pushes from your dotster account, renew for $7.99! 1. Create a netcheap account. 2. Push from dotster to netcheap account name. 3. Renew for $7.99!
I usually develop sites with fixed table sizes, so I normally make them up to 770 width. Not many people use 640x480 anymore, but 800x600 is still very common.
RMF
This is what I do as well. Then it fills the screen at any resolution. Just set your table sizes at 100% rather than a specific pixel size.Originally posted by GiantDomains
Make it fit both (expanding tables, etc.)
DNJournal.com Fly Like an Igal: Lichtman Innovates Again With Dazzling Automatic Website Building Technology at TrafficMedia
NameNewbie.com
Here's a good article on the topic:
http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/...html?tw=design
Thanks all for your help!
nosig @ this time
took the words right out of my mouthOriginally posted by RMF
I usually develop sites with fixed table sizes, so I normally make them up to 770 width. Not many people use 640x480 anymore, but 800x600 is still very common.
RMF![]()
I develop it for 800x600. It still looks fine in higher resolutions.
Sometimes an adjustable layout looks funky in different resolutions and browsers.
.
I m not a specialist, but when i ask a technician to make me a website, i insist that it is made in a printer friendly resolution.
we normally just create a master table centered, size 750
that way the page always looks the same, only a few people (640 res) don't see the whole screen
if someone comes in bigger, it still looks the same, only more blank space on the side
when you go 100% tables then you can't control the real lookof the page,
some people don't want to control the look
we found that the master table set to 750 pixels is the way to keep a page looking the same no matter what the res of the viewer is
all you have to do is test your sites once in a while at different res's and using both IE and NS
you'd be amazed at how the site changes if you don't try to lock in a specific size
plus you should define a common font, something a lot of people don't do
we usually use arial or verdana
size 1 is a little small but it gets in a ton of info
size 2 is easiest to view
there's a place on the net that can check your html after you're done
I forget the name
but it looks at your code and image size and download speed and it tells you if you have any major html problems
maybe someone else remembers the name of that site
I think MS bought it up
maybe it's not around no more
but for newbie designers, it does give you some good tips
Bookmarks