Welcome to Welcome to DNF.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars

If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,370
    DNF$
    3,092
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    3,092
    Donate  

    Can't compress .jpg's smaller than about 90k

    I've got this 6.1 megapixel camera. Have set it to the lowest setting of 1.7 megapixels, standard quality. Using Ulead PhotoImpact 8, can't seem to get the .jpg files smaller than about 90K, which I feel is too large. Ulead PhotoImpact won't take it below a 10% compression even though it enables you to request lower settings. With the camera taking pictures on the highest image settings, the smallest I can compress the .jpg's is about 195K, so at least it's an improvement.

    If I were using something like PhotoShop, could I get the .jpg's substantially smaller than 90K? Is 90K actually not bad? Is it simply the camera? What about other software options besides switching to PhotoShop for this purpose? Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    The One
    VisualDigits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,916
    DNF$
    1,070
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    1,070
    Donate  

    Re: Can't compress .jpg's smaller than about 90k

    PhotoShop will do it, as well as Paint Shop Pro.
    Cogito, ergo sum!

  3. #3
    Master of the cave
    fryman04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    780
    DNF$
    6,720
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    6,720
    Donate  

    Re: Can't compress .jpg's smaller than about 90k

    I use xat.com Professional Image Optimizer

    Post an image and I'll compress it so you can see the difference

  4. #4
    Social Media Evangelist
    dotcomgiant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Hyderabad
    Posts
    778
    Country

    India Follow dotcomgiant On Twitter Add dotcomgiant on Facebook
    DNF$
    4,511
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    4,511
    Donate  

    Re: Can't compress .jpg's smaller than about 90k

    yes..its pretty impressive specially the Clean / De-Noise and color correction features.
    LocaFY.in - The smartest way to find local information in India

  5. #5
    DNF Addict

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,480
    DNF$
    15,491
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,491
    Donate  

    Re: Can't compress .jpg's smaller than about 90k

    I'm not sure you're going to like your results. 1.7 megapixels is 1600x1064. Any photographic image that large at maximum JPEG compression is still going to require around 90k.

    Perhaps what you need to do is first use ULead to crop or resize your image, then save it. This will reduce the resolution to something more reasonable for web distribution, (i.e., 640x480). This will help you achieve the file size you desire without creating essentially a very blurry image.
    Sam
    --
    I'm just waiting 'til the shine wears off.

  6. #6
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,370
    DNF$
    3,092
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    3,092
    Donate  

    Re: Can't compress .jpg's smaller than about 90k

    Quote Originally Posted by FLe8
    I'm not sure you're going to like your results. 1.7 megapixels is 1600x1064. Any photographic image that large at maximum JPEG compression is still going to require around 90k.

    Perhaps what you need to do is first use ULead to crop or resize your image, then save it. This will reduce the resolution to something more reasonable for web distribution, (i.e., 640x480). This will help you achieve the file size you desire without creating essentially a very blurry image.
    Just managed to get back to this thread, and I want to thank all of you for these responses - I really appreciate it.

    I'll give the suggestion about Ulead above a try. In the meantime, since 1.7 megapixels starts out so large to begin with, how would I go about with a smaller starting point? How do other people do it? Are there special cameras for this? Thanks again for any further input.

  7. #7
    DNF Addict

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,480
    DNF$
    15,491
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,491
    Donate  

    Re: Can't compress .jpg's smaller than about 90k

    If you need to resize one image, you can do this inside of Ulead before you save. If you need to modify a large number of images before opening them (will save a lot of time), I recommend Photographer's Power Tools. See http://www.justrightclick.com/ for more information.
    Sam
    --
    I'm just waiting 'til the shine wears off.

  8. #8
    Platinum Lifetime Member
    cooljeba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    On your monitor
    Posts
    1,002
    DNF$
    2,079
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    2,079
    Donate  

    Re: Can't compress .jpg's smaller than about 90k

    at such high resolution you can't expect your image to be compressed eblow 90 kb without loosing the quality.

    ..:: peace ::..
    Jeba
    Beautiful Scraps- The Motivational Blog | LogoDesign - Portfolio | PM me to get your Logo Done.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com