__Duplicate content on Page question, for 3000 PAGES..??

[eyes2005]

I am developing pages for my website on tomatoes, and want 3000 pages of content consisting of one article per page. Each article will be based on a keyword related to tomatoe juice.

So content site, 3000 articles on 3000 separate pages, based on 3000 different keywords.

I will also include affiliate links at the Bottom of the articles....so provide
use full Content/information, then Selling to them


On
Affiliate links, identical paragraphs, wording

Each webpage will be broken up into two parts -

The first half will contain the Unique article,
but the Second half of the page will have affiliate links, and i am going to include the SAME IDENTICAL links + paragraphs on every 3000 of the pages(below their articles)

Second part Like this(eg)..

************************************************** ********
Affiliate link 1- "get great tomatoe juice here" [Link - click here]
Affiliate link 2 - "tomatoe gardeners dream" [Link - click here]
Affiliate link 3 - "tomatoe growing tips" [Link - click here]
Affiliate link 4 - "make tomatoe juice - ebook" [Link - click here]
Affiliate link 5 - "get great tomatoe juice here" [Link - click here]

************************************************** ********

so on my 3000 pages i will have that above IDENTICAL 6 paragraphs + links
so I will have identical content, 3000 times, but just on 6 paragraphs.

But each 3000 pages wil have Different articles on from each other

Here's the Questions...
a)In terms of Identical content..is this bad? will search engines see it as Identical content,
even though the TOP articles are different?

b)any other ideas, suggestion ?

For example- Don't include the affiliate links on them 3000 websites, but to ONE page (homepage)
and redirect traffic from my 3000 pages to that one page?

(nb- i wil have adsense on all my 3000 pages)

c)Does anybody else have this kinda site - 2000-3000 article content pages, with adense, etc... ?

How are you doing, any advice, tips?
Bad SEO experiences?

Share your experiences.. + Answer my questions, a),b), c)

[Banned: AlienGG]

use
class="robots-nocontent"
tag.
For example:

 <span class="robots-nocontent">They are </span>free<span class="robots-nocontent"> men once again!
They are the ones protecting us from</span> porn<span class="robots-nocontent"> on the Internet.</span> 
  

What the spiders/crawlers see here is ....... free porn.
The tag can be attached to virtually anything, from <p> to <object>.

[eyes2005]

use
class="robots-nocontent"
tag.
For example: <span class="robots-nocontent">They are </span>free<span class="robots-nocontent"> men once again! They are the ones protecting us from</span> porn<span class="robots-nocontent"> on the Internet.</span>

What the spiders/crawlers see here is ....... free porn.
The tag can be attached to virtually anything, from <p> to <object>.

Thanks..

So you are blinding the Search engines from content, so they don't see what you Robot/blank out right?

Is that a solution to putting up identical content on 1000s of pages, without the Search engines seeing it as duplicate content......

Is that a good/legal, SE freindly solution to my problem?

Anybody else do it, and has had no problems/issues with it ?

[Banned: AlienGG]

Totally legal

[eyes2005]

Totally legal

Thanks but, nobody has answered my view of it.....


==> So you are blinding the Search engines from content, so they don't see what you Robot/blank out right?

Is that a solution to putting up identical content on 1000s of pages, without the Search engines seeing it as duplicate content......

Is that a good SE freindly solution to my problem?

Anybody else do it, and has had no problems/issues with it ?

[Banned: AlienGG]

So you are blinding the Search engines from content, so they don't see what you Robot/blank out right?

yes. if they don't allow such thing, they would not support this tag.

Is that a solution to putting up identical content on 1000s of pages, without the Search engines seeing it as duplicate content......

yes. i use it for the copyright disclaimer.

Is that a good SE freindly solution to my problem?

yes and easily gamed.

Anybody else do it, and has had no problems/issues with it ?

I did it before i applied for adsense. Google checked and approved my site and gave me my account.

[Liquiteq]

use
class="robots-nocontent"
tag.
For example:

 <span class="robots-nocontent">They are </span>free<span class="robots-nocontent"> men once again!
They are the ones protecting us from</span> porn<span class="robots-nocontent"> on the Internet.</span> 
  

What the spiders/crawlers see here is ....... free porn.
The tag can be attached to virtually anything, from <p> to <object>.

Hmm, I would suggest against this.

Firstly, Google's interest is in usability and relevance. Regardless of openly hiding this content in the name of penalization avoidance, it is Google's job to assess how unique, and useful your information is. Not much will go unnoticed. Clearly this duplication across 3000 pages will adversely affect your site quality. The rule of thumb is, "If it's that similar, it should probably go on the same page". Now this isn't ideal for this scenario, but there is no substitution for best practice.

My first suggestion would be review the way you're going to present these affiliate links where possible.

Affiliate links are your friends, and should be used accordingly. Maintaining and increasing site power is important, and you don't need to block anything to do so.

A couple of tips in doing this:

* Create a jump script, very simple. - PHP example - $_GET the respective aff url, and use header location (not redirect) on this jump page, to present the relevant affiliate page.

* Try to nest these links tastefully within the content. You will see a far higher CTR yield, and conversion rate.

* Depending on the market, it is sometimes more beneficial to make people aware that it is an aff link, particularly for the tech savvy. This gains more respect and confidence. If the user is not aware, don't worry, they won't understand what (aff) is anyway.


A few questions for you:

What volume of dupe content are we talking?

How many separate affiliates are you dealing with?

Is the paragraph necessary? Are you able to omit this?

If you could provide a little more detail about the nature of the aff system you will be using it'll be easier to suggest a more specific solution.

[hostele]

Im not sure if google spider would consider these links duplicated content as long as each page has its own unique content, but I would highly recommand using rel="nofollow" with your affiliate links. This way you will inform google spider that these links are external. So, google will simply ignore these links and your pages won't leak pagerank.

[DNWizardX9]

I'm sure these 3000 articles are on numerous other websites as well making them essentially duplicates. Unless you're bill gates of course and paid someone to make you 3000 pages of original seo content. ;-)

I would advise against it. I was doing this a long time ago. I made a mint but then Google blacklisted my site after 2 months.

[unholy1]

I would advise against it. I was doing this a long time ago. I made a mint but then Google blacklisted my site after 2 months.

Yeah, got my sites thrown into the supplements too using commonly used content, just used a translation service and added the translated version at the bottom and pulled them out of the supplements and actually started getting an increase in traffic and SERP listings.
Even though it worked, it was only used to pull them out of the supplements, I had all the pages re-done with better content using a content modification tool after they they made it back into the SERP's and dumped the translations.