Most likely that part in bold had a lot to do with this imho...The plaintiffs had attempted to bring a class action against multiple defendants for purported trademark infringement, cybersquatting and deceptive trade practices
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Most likely that part in bold had a lot to do with this imho...The plaintiffs had attempted to bring a class action against multiple defendants for purported trademark infringement, cybersquatting and deceptive trade practices
intent is key, deceptive or not, intent to infringe is key.
"it could also have deprived trademark owners of the right to recover statutory damages of up to $100,000 per domain name for cybersquatting."
could have.....up to 100,000 - far cry from any kind of actual award
Bookmarks