That's what we would like to think. However with some outrageous wipo outcomes it makes you really wonder. Even if you were to purchase windows.web (which is actually possible unlike the .com version) and have stained glass links the Microsoft legal team will make the argument like this:
Because this is an "Internet" domain name, most if not all users using the Internet know about Windows the "Monopoly" software company. Therefore they typed in the address with that in mind. For this reason, they should be entitled the domain. In other words, because their brand is so big it is not enough to argue on the basis of descriptive words.
I couldn't have said it better myself.While I am against TM and infringing usage, WIPO has become more like a coupon to an expensive domain than actually protecting rights (Hero.com is a perfect example).






Even poor development and upkeep helped in this case.




Reply With Quote








Bookmarks