The widget similarities are shocking. Did Snapnames copy its functions, did they have access to source code?
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!In previous thread, I was writing also about how Moniker shaved me with snapnames affiliate and you can see from e-mail communication that my Snapnames affiliate widget was delayed and later ignored completely by Monte Cahn.
Essociate widget:
http://fpa.essociate.com/1000901.0.1021.431
My original widget months before Snapnames even joined Essociate:
http://freshsnap.com/widget
(Some data sources at freshsnap.com are dead as after Snapnames shaving, my programmer and partner did drop from project and there was nobody to fix errors)
Funny, isn't it?
The widget similarities are shocking. Did Snapnames copy its functions, did they have access to source code?
As you see, they didn't pick data (which aren't working that much these days). They didn't have access to scripts on separate HW.
Unluckily on both Freshsnap web and widget, snapnames\keyworddomains and snapnames\shortdomains doesn't work, but if it will, you'll see that that it was 95% ripoff.
Last edited by zabijaq; 06-02-2010 at 04:37 AM.
I've e-mailed Essociate, Monte Cahn and Jeff Kupiecky on this issue. Guess what - no reply![]()
Bookmarks