Would be interesting to know the reasons behind the initial decision...and what changed to cause the reversal.
BTW, welcome Bonkers.
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Good News for vaxis and all those people who keeps bidding on porn domains at snapnames in the past 2 days.
Would be interesting to know the reasons behind the initial decision...and what changed to cause the reversal.
BTW, welcome Bonkers.
Hi Bonkers!
Are you the same bonkerstwo on snapnames?![]()
Please vote Republican in 2012, America can not sustain another 4 years
of Liberal policies that are fiscally and socially destroying the country..
*Monetize*...
Hi
I'm not into adult, but I'm glad to see it's possible to change a giant's mind, and achieve something for the common good.
always buying domains with type-in traffic. all tlds.
got something to do with unclesam.com.
I think Google realized how much revenue they were going to lose. Porn is definitely not going anywhere, it is here to stay! Btw welcome Bonkerstwo!
Always buying .COM revenue type-ins. PM me!
that is too bad. I would be happy if yahoo was alone in this business
because from my experience parking with yahoo feed pays more than google, and if google is out of the way in this niche then obviously yahoo gets more advertisers which will drive the bids up, increasing the revenue of our adult names.
I'd be guessing here, but I reckon it was one of those "belief" issues. At least now they can say "well.... we tried it and we lost $X in revenue". I wonder if this means porn "is not evil?"
For those that don't know... the Google mantra has long been "dont do evil".
![]()
Get Your Free Membership!
Bookmarks