It does not surpise me that the legal owner of a trademark that someone else has registered has the upper hand in recovering his legal mark. Does this surprise you?
The article does state however
Quote:
|
the party that filed the complaint must prove three factors: that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; that the defendant has no rights or legitimate interest in the name, and that the name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
|
which is certainly the burden of proof on the filing party where it belongs.
I did not find anything objectionable in this article, nor was there anything particularly new in my observation.
-t
06-27-2002, 07:54 AM
Similar Threads 
Trademark holders prevail in domain fights 
Linear Mode
