I say kudos to the seller too!!!!
Amazing!
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!WebcamRoulette.com sold for $47,500
Did you guy see the list at DNJournal.com? I remember seeing it somewhere on this forum just recently, can't find the thread but was surprised to see that it sold for that much. Although registered in 2006 which is way before CamRoulette.com but it is still a pretty good return provided the original owner sold it.
I say kudos to the seller.
What are your thoughts on this? I would love to hear comments from the experts on this forum.
PeopleSearchOn.com | MobilePhoneCity.net | DentalPlansProvider.com | ChristiansForDating.com | CallingCardDepot.com | MobilePhoneX.com | MindRoulette.com
I say kudos to the seller too!!!!
Amazing!
as long as perverted old men exist, such domains will always have a market in the porn industry![]()
Pay Per Click Forum | payperclick.biz | bgrbloomer.com | Charity-gift.com | PokerForum.org.uk | EfficientSearch.co.uk | HolidayForum.co.uk | Magaluf.org | AdPreviewTool.com
PeopleSearchOn.com | MobilePhoneCity.net | DentalPlansProvider.com | ChristiansForDating.com | CallingCardDepot.com | MobilePhoneX.com | MindRoulette.com
Smells fishy to me. Don't believe it, and I don't care how trustworthy everyone says everybody else is (see Snap Names). Seems like a lot of noise for a name that is a far distant cousin to ChatRoulette.com, and for sure doesn't get much type-in traffic.
Unless there is something else to the story I am calling bull. Just a bunch of noise. Either that, or it is the worst buy in the history of domaining (ranking close to Sportsbook.mobi that allegedly sold for 127K.....Oh, that's right, it didn't, but it was reported the same way).
Bookmarks