

![]() |
| ![]() | |||||||
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Platinum Lifetime Member
Country: | DomainSponsor new payment model Well, we all know that now DS pays more if the traffic is converting to sale. My question is - Are they doing this per domain or per account ? I mean, if I have some crappy traffic names and some high quality traffic names - are the crappy ones going to bring down the revenues from the high quality domains, or is it "every domain for itself" ? Thanks
__________________ » D o m a i n e r s H u b . C o m |
| | |
| Sponsored Ads |
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| DNF Addict
Country: | Re: DomainSponsor new payment model Quote:
My Questions I was reading you "Rewarding Traffic Quality" announcement and have a two questions. "we have developed greater insight into the performance of each individual publisher's traffic stream. We can now more accurately gauge the quality (backend sales conversion) of your specific traffic and compensate you accordingly." Is this worked out on a per domain basis or on the publisher's traffic quality as a whole? Example: Say I had the following in my account... 1.Poorqualitytrafficdomain.com 2.Topqualitytrafficdomain.com 3.Poorqualitytrafficdomain.com Would the revenue I receive for "Topqualitydomain.com" suffer because I also have two poor quality traffic names? Does your system favour generic names e.g. loans.com over typos e.g. laons.com, or is it based purely on the quality of the traffic and how it converts and the actual name doesn't matter one iota? Could, theoretically, assuming traffic level, quality and conversions been equal djdkdj8dd.com earn the same amount as genericname.com or would genericname.com always earn more regardless? Answer Regarding your first question, it is worked out on a per domain basis. Per your example, revenue that you could receive for "Topqualitydomain.com" would not suffer due to your two poor quality traffic names. In regards to your second question, our system is purely based on the quality of the traffic and how it converts. In our testing, we have seen that generic names tend to perform better, but it still boils down to how the traffic converts. Hopefully I have answered your questions. If you have any others please let me know. --------------------------------- Hope this helps ![]() - Rob | |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Platinum Lifetime Member
Country: | Re: DomainSponsor new payment model Thanks guys - very helpfull.
__________________ » D o m a i n e r s H u b . C o m |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| DNF Regular Last Online: 11-20-2009 01:42 PM iTrader: (6) Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 867
DNF$: 3,627 Location: California
Country: | Re: DomainSponsor new payment model Quote:
Rob. Thanks. Excellent Post.
__________________ PPCIncome.com for a comparison of Pay Per Click parking services Last edited by hiOsilver; 10-31-2005 at 09:32 PM.. Reason: shorten | |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |