Yes ... no reason for them to park it with there services making .03 per click. lmao
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Yes ... no reason for them to park it with there services making .03 per click. lmao
Nice namesSister Sites:
WeatherReports.com • NewsAlerts.com Degrees.com Photograph.com
Originally Posted by DotComGod
------------------
the domain name was previously owned by a member of this forum who sold it for a xx,xxx figure.
its probably not parked so as to avoid being seen as a bad faith registration.
Enterprise Communications and Social Media in Uist
That could be it. All that you should ever need to demonstrate a good faith registration is bona-fide use for a reasonable period of time. But in this case it would appear unneccesary.Originally Posted by namestrands
Support and FUND the ICA!
Not quite sure that's a "hmmmm...."
Aside from the already mentioned reasons (Bad faith, cheap clicks, etc.), it also does a lot to cheapen the feel of a domain name. I know that I still have a hard time going to now-developed sites with strong keywords that were once parked. I use to check my name and others in .com , but they were registered by marchek's pred who had the most annoying damn pop-ups ever. Now, a few are developed, but I still don't like visiting because of the stigma attached to the sites in my mind...
A very touchy-feely reason, but one none-the-less.
Bookmarks