It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

DNforum.com - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals
 
Register Now!
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our forums. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:  
Birthday:       I agree to forum rules 

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Gold Forums > Gold Cafe > Politics/Controversial
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2008, 01:42 PM   #61 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Name: James
Last Online: Today 05:22 AM
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,851
DNF$: 337
Location: UK
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by bd77 View Post
Do yourself a favor and worry about your own country. Its always the same thing with you liberals here if I don't agree with you I'm either stupid, gullible or brainwashed.
Actually, probably all three.

And no, it is the US that worries me. The UK is more embarrassing than worrying, because we are in your pocket and will follow wherever you go.
jasdon11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-21-2008, 01:46 PM   #62 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
bd77's Avatar
 
Name: Don A.
Last Online: Yesterday 09:42 PM
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 994
DNF$: 150
Location: Carney,Maryland
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by nameslave View Post
To be fair though, democracy is about letting everybody incl. the stupid ones to decide. True, this sometimes leads to undesirable results when populists stir up people's emotion. We have Hitler, McCarthy, and the genrally panicked post-9/11 American public. But then, humanity always survives (e.g. the U.S. public is eventually turning around); and there is actually no better way to check and balance whom we entrust our lives and freedom. As long as the institution of free elections stay, the dark days will finally be over.
I don't mind arguing with you about politics but don't call me stupid just because I don't agree with you. When liberals resort to name calling it makes you look like you have lost the argument. The rest of your statement is same old tired argument your side has been using for years now. Its not even worth my time to comment on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasdon11 View Post
Actually, probably all three.

And no, it is the US that worries me. The UK is more embarrassing than worrying, because we are in your pocket and will follow wherever you go.
How would you like it if I insulted you? You wouldn't like it very much I bet. Just remember the more insults you throw my way the weaker your arguments look. This a failed tactic used by the left time and time again and one of the many reasons liberalism holds no appeal for Americans anymore.
__________________
"The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."-Ronald Reagan

Last edited by bd77; 07-21-2008 at 01:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
bd77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 02:40 PM   #63 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Name: James
Last Online: Today 05:22 AM
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,851
DNF$: 337
Location: UK
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by bd77 View Post
How would you like it if I insulted you? You wouldn't like it very much I bet. Just remember the more insults you throw my way the weaker your arguments look. This a failed tactic used by the left time and time again and one of the many reasons liberalism holds no appeal for Americans anymore.
I didn't mean to insult you - I apologise if you are.

Not matter how heated these 9/11 and political threads get, I don't mean any malice to anyone on this board; I take them pretty light-heartedly.
jasdon11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 04:01 PM   #64 (permalink)
 
Raider's Avatar
 
Name: RG
Last Online: Today 02:33 AM
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,808
DNF$: 3,368
Location: Private
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by jasdon11 View Post
Oh brother...you guys have no idea about terrorism.

In the UK we lived with the constant threat from the IRA for nearly three decades. If a terrorist wants to do something, they will. It's pretty much as simple as that.
You also lived next door to Ireland for 3 + decades.

I will agree with you that if somebody wants to commit a crime, they will. But a planned mass killing like what we had on 911, I'd say its highly unlikely under the leadership of a President who considers Homeland Security a top priority.
__________________
Is this our next President?
Raider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 05:07 PM   #65 (permalink)
Domain Whiz
 
biggedon's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 07:49 PM
iTrader: (105)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,246
DNF$: 34,734
Location: 96.net


Quote:
Originally Posted by jasdon11 View Post
Unbelievable!

So you actually believe that a BS war in Iraq is keeping terrorists away from the US??? Maybe they can't get a visa huh....or is it the queues at the airports? Being a suicide bomber just ain't so easy any more....

Don't you think that it's just a teeny bit strange that there haven't been any attacks for 7 years - even though there are now millions more people with a grudge against America? We're talking people who would happily blow themselves up if it meant they took out one of you. Terrorists, terrorists, terrorists - how many times have you been brainwashed with that word?

Don't kid yourself - 'real' terrorists cannot be defeated by wars. It's like trying to change someones beliefs by force; can't be done.

The next time The States takes a hit, will be as a precursor to invade another country.

What is truly frightening, is that people so gullible are allowed to vote!
agree



it's like what one of mcCain's supporters said,
"that if another terrorist attack happened before the election, McCain would surely win".



it's either "fear of terrorists" or "change for a new direction", that will decide this election.



BTW:

I went to see comedian Chris Rock in concert last night in Chicago.

he asked the question..."how can Ben Laden, who's been hiding in a cave somewhere with no electricity, keep making new videos every few months?"

__________________
worldiptv.com * greenfriendly.com * svc.net * belisted.com
mobi.us.com * sop.net * qfm.net * vioz.com *
Need A SedoPro Account PM Me
biggedon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 05:34 PM   #66 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Seraphim's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 08:23 PM
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,977
DNF$: 2,533
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by biggedon View Post
I went to see comedian Chris Rock in concert last night in Chicago.

he asked the question..."how can Ben Laden, who's been hiding in a cave somewhere with no electricity, keep making new videos every few months?"

He still has a few months left on his contract with Universal Studios... and Palm Springs is hardly a cave.
Seraphim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 05:38 PM   #67 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
bd77's Avatar
 
Name: Don A.
Last Online: Yesterday 09:42 PM
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 994
DNF$: 150
Location: Carney,Maryland
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by biggedon View Post
agree



it's like what one of mcCain's supporters said,
"that if another terrorist attack happened before the election, McCain would surely win".



it's either "fear of terrorists" or "change for a new direction", that will decide this election.



BTW:

I went to see comedian Chris Rock in concert last night in Chicago.

he asked the question..."how can Ben Laden, who's been hiding in a cave somewhere with no electricity, keep making new videos every few months?"

I find it interesting that a Mod would comment in a political thread. I new from the beginning that was part of the minority here.

Its true that McCain would handle a terrorist threat much better that Obama. Its a simple fact IMO. You said there is two options and one of them is to go in a new direction. Obama is not a new direction he believes in the same old failed policies of the left, one being appeasement of our enemies. He just speaks real well and everybody gets excited.

BTW Osama Bin Laden just doesn't live in a cave, he has free rain throughout Pakistan and parts of Afghanistan and who's fault is this our so called ally Pervez Musharraf who won't allow us to send ground troops into northern Pakistan to get Osama and his ilk.
__________________
"The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."-Ronald Reagan
bd77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 05:49 PM   #68 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Name: James
Last Online: Today 05:22 AM
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,851
DNF$: 337
Location: UK
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by biggedon View Post

it's like what one of mcCain's supporters said,
"that if another terrorist attack happened before the election, McCain would surely win".
Brace yourselves!
jasdon11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 09:09 PM   #69 (permalink)
 
Raider's Avatar
 
Name: RG
Last Online: Today 02:33 AM
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,808
DNF$: 3,368
Location: Private
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by biggedon View Post
it's either "fear of terrorists" or "change for a new direction", that will decide this election.
Ah Yes, the famous "Change" word, It sure does sound good but nobody knows if that "Change" will be good or bad.

JFK used the same message, and he delivered on that message giving us plenty of "Change", Like Obama, he gave us his inexperience...

His meeting with Kruschev that led to the Cuban Missle Crisis.

The Bay of Pigs invasion, 4000-5000 Killed.

Record increase in military presence in Vietnam, 800 to 16,300.
Total dead: 285,831 Total wounded: 1,490,000

Allowing the construction of the Berlin wall, The wall that Ronald Reagan tore down!.

All this in only 2 years and 9 months as President, that's some "Change"
__________________
Is this our next President?
Raider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 02:54 AM   #70 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Name: James
Last Online: Today 05:22 AM
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,851
DNF$: 337
Location: UK
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Raider View Post
Ah Yes, the famous "Change" word, It sure does sound good but nobody knows if that "Change" will be good or bad.

JFK used the same message, and he delivered on that message giving us plenty of "Change", Like Obama, he gave us his inexperience...

His meeting with Kruschev that led to the Cuban Missle Crisis.

The Bay of Pigs invasion, 4000-5000 Killed.

Record increase in military presence in Vietnam, 800 to 16,300.
Total dead: 285,831 Total wounded: 1,490,000


Allowing the construction of the Berlin wall, The wall that Ronald Reagan tore down!.


All this in only 2 years and 9 months as President, that's some "Change"

As I understand it, the US didn't actually enter combat in Vietnam until 1965 - two years after JFK was killed. How do you blame it on a dead guy?

And the Berlin Wall.....you surely can't credit the US in either putting it up or pulling it down - what next, gonna say an American discovered Europe?

This shows how out of whack with reality you are.
jasdon11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 03:13 AM   #71 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
bd77's Avatar
 
Name: Don A.
Last Online: Yesterday 09:42 PM
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 994
DNF$: 150
Location: Carney,Maryland
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by jasdon11 View Post
As I understand it, the US didn't actually enter combat in Vietnam until 1965 - two years after JFK was killed. How do you blame it on a dead guy?
Its a fact that JFK escalated war in Vietnam. It was he who pushed for a bigger US role there. The war itself was brought on by French inaction to the growing communist threat led by China in 1959.

Quote:
And the Berlin Wall.....you surely can't credit the US in either putting it up or pulling it down - what next, gonna say an American discovered Europe?
Ronald Reagan was mostly responsible for the fall of the Berlin wall. Since it coincides with the fall of the Soviet Union.
__________________
"The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it."-Ronald Reagan
bd77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 04:02 AM   #72 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Name: James
Last Online: Today 05:22 AM
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,851
DNF$: 337
Location: UK
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by bd77 View Post
Its a fact that JFK escalated war in Vietnam. It was he who pushed for a bigger US role there. The war itself was brought on by French inaction to the growing communist threat led by China in 1959.



Ronald Reagan was mostly responsible for the fall of the Berlin wall. Since it coincides with the fall of the Soviet Union.
The way I understand history, is that JFK was killed because he didn't want Vietnam to escalate into combat. The undeniable fact is that he was two years dead by the time combat started.

And could you please explain just what Ronald Reagan did towards the fall of the Soviet Union? There are a lot of Russians who might think they did more....
jasdon11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 06:52 AM   #73 (permalink)
fab
 
fab's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 04:16 AM
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,363
DNF$: 24
Location: Elad
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by jasdon11 View Post
The way I understand history, is that JFK was killed because he didn't want Vietnam to escalate into combat. The undeniable fact is that he was two years dead by the time combat started.

And could you please explain just what Ronald Reagan did towards the fall of the Soviet Union? There are a lot of Russians who might think they did more....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War

Quote:
The Vietnam War, also known as the Second Indochina War, or the Vietnam Conflict, occurred from 1959[9] to April 30, 1975. The war was fought between the communist Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam), supported by its communist allies, and the US-supported Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam).
fab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 07:45 AM   #74 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Name: James
Last Online: Today 05:22 AM
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,851
DNF$: 337
Location: UK
Country:


From the piece you linked to:

Quote:
The United States entered the war to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam (as part of a wider strategy of containment during the Cold War), beginning with military advisory missions in the early 1960s and escalating to full warfare with the deployment of combat units from 1965 onward. By 1973, almost all U.S. troops had left the theater and in 1975, communist forces assumed control of South Vietnam. North and South Vietnam were reunified shortly thereafter.
jasdon11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 07:53 AM   #75 (permalink)
fab
 
fab's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 04:16 AM
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,363
DNF$: 24
Location: Elad
Country:


Quote:
As I understand it, the US didn't actually enter combat in Vietnam until 1965
Is not the same as:

Quote:
and escalating to full warfare with the deployment of combat units from 1965 onward
Combat started here:

Quote:
The United States entered the war to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam (as part of a wider strategy of containment during the Cold War), beginning with military advisory missions in the early 1960s
fab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 08:23 AM   #76 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Name: James
Last Online: Today 05:22 AM
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,851
DNF$: 337
Location: UK
Country:


"didn't enter combat in Vietnam until 1965"


"deployment of combat units from 1965 onward"


Looks the same to me...
jasdon11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 02:35 PM   #77 (permalink)
 
Raider's Avatar
 
Name: RG
Last Online: Today 02:33 AM
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,808
DNF$: 3,368
Location: Private
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by jasdon11 View Post
"didn't enter combat in Vietnam until 1965"


"deployment of combat units from 1965 onward"


Looks the same to me...
What looks the same to me is your ignorance on yet another subject.

"President John F. Kennedy rounded another turning point in early 1961, when he secretly sent 400 Special Operations Forces-trained (Green Beret) soldiers to teach the South Vietnamese how to fight what was called counterinsurgency war against Communist guerrillas in South Vietnam. When Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963, there were more than 16,000 U.S. military advisers in South Vietnam, and more than 100 Americans had been killed"

Perhaps this might help you;

http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/vietnam/causes.htm

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasdon11 View Post
As I understand it, the US didn't actually enter combat in Vietnam until 1965 - two years after JFK was killed. How do you blame it on a dead guy?

And the Berlin Wall.....you surely can't credit the US in either putting it up or pulling it down - what next, gonna say an American discovered Europe?

This shows how out of whack with reality you are.

Priceless


LOL
__________________