FOX News Saves America

[Gregcyber]

What I find funny is: Not one of the Obama supporters can make a claim " Obama Saves America"

I sit on my chair, I type, I claim Obama and the current White House Administration is lying, hiding facts and pays others to promote the grand allusion that Obama is the Messiah. folol = flips over laughing out loud.

[DomainsInc]

Originally Posted by Gregcyber

What I find funny is: Not one of the Obama supporters can make a claim " Obama Saves America"

I sit on my chair, I type, I claim Obama and the current White House Administration is lying, hiding facts and pays others to promote the grand allusion that Obama is the Messiah. folol = flips over laughing out loud.

I can not make sense of what you wrote...Anyone can make a claim about anything. GregCyber saves mars from invasion of mars bars. Sound good?

[think]

Originally Posted by Gregcyber

What I find funny is: Not one of the Obama supporters can make a claim " Obama Saves America"

I sit on my chair, I type, I claim Obama and the current White House Administration is lying, hiding facts and pays others to promote the grand allusion that Obama is the Messiah. folol = flips over laughing out loud.

What does this have to do with Fox News saving America? Or are you just giving us a perfect example of how people try to use insults and accusations to avoid discussing the facts and keeping to the subject of a thread?

If you want to discuss specific lies perpetrated by the Obama administration that you can back up with facts please do so but slinging baseless insults is just ridiculous....

[Gregcyber]

Originally Posted by think

slinging baseless insults is just ridiculous....

Yeah, I wish the democrats would stop that crap.

[DomainsInc]

Originally Posted by Gregcyber

Yeah, I wish the democrats would stop that crap.

Here is something to look at

Check out Bush's snopes page http://snopes.com/politics/bush

now look at Obama's http://snopes.com/politics/obama

Bush who had 10 years to get all sorts of lies and misinformation about him spread around has much less than Obama who has only had 2 years.

[Area52]

Originally Posted by H2FC

Sorry to have to disagree with the Glenn Beck supporters but I see him as the TV version of Rush Limbaugh.....and just like Rush he's a lying hypocrite who's in it just for the money. He's a disgrace to America.

Obama lied during and after his campaign. That's not a "disgrace"?

Obama is like the emperor with no clothes. His supporters are trying to convince themselves and others (good luck with that) that he does have clothes, even when there is much evidence that he is as naked as a jaybird. The major networks are major participants in this sham and are about as objective as a dog in heat.

Fox is reporting facts that we probably wouldn't know about otherwise. Facts that helped expose the fraud/criminal activity at ACORN or the dubious background of BO's various appointees. Or reporting that our representatives did approve and are approving a raid on our pocketbooks worth trillions of dollars without even reading the dam bill. Fox is just exposing the Obama administration for what it is. That's why the present administration is disgracing themselves by trashing the U.S. Constitution to try and silence Fox. Obama and his motley crew just screwed themselves for sure.

Maybe there is a speck of hope for the other news stations however, they recently took up for Fox in regards to the Chavez-like tactics coming from the White House.

[JMJ]

Originally Posted by Area52

How do you know a story is "full of bull" if you don't even know what the story is? You're psychic?

Because in Becks case in particular he has co-opted a number of major stories that broke elsewhere first. That's why I asked for the names of and the dates because I can guarantee that I could prove they actually didn't break those stories. It happens all the time with these MSM outlets. To give you a great example right here on this forum have a look at the date I posted in this thread and when MSM finally reported on it along with claiming they broke the story.

My post 09-02-2009, 07:49 AM

Washigton Post's "Exclusive"
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...s-data/?page=2

Two weeks later...

[Gregcyber]

Originally Posted by think

I'm sure you see all kinds of "news" on Fox News. Here is Glenn Beck telling his users not to go to Cars.gov because the Obama administration will confiscate the information on your computer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWs12ccbOiE

Oh no! Don't click this link or you'll give control of your computer to Obama!:

http://Cars.gov

I dare you to click it! (nothing will happen. it was just a lie manufactured by Glenn Beck to scare you away from using the Cash for Clunkers program. )
...

This story (in quote) broke first by Glenn Beck.

Washington Post might of had a insider and was faster confirming and posting this news about "W.H. collects Web users' data without notice" collecting info off websites. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...s-data/?page=2
I have to say Glenn Beck was searching for the info first on the same subject. He just wanted to make sure he had the facts right before some group called him a bull crap reporter.

[ilovedomains]

Glen Beck is the democrats best friend. He makes republicans look like morons, and that has been forcing people with self respect to leave the party in droves.

No one in the last 50 years has painted a clearer picture of how stark raving mad the extreme right really is. Keep up the good work Glen. You probably get more votes for the democrats than Sarah Palin does.

[Gregcyber]

I'm just loving it , posting in the political forum, rants about the government.
I think its best to quit my rants, maybe hazardous to my wellbeing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s3SN...eature=related Temptation

[Doc Com]

Originally Posted by think

What does this have to do with Fox News saving America?

What does Obama need to save America from? and why?

Those seem to be questions that many don't want to ask or acknowledge (especially the why).

[zurc.net]

Just another cry for some attention, imho...

[HarveyJ]

Originally Posted by Gregcyber

This story (in quote) broke first by Glenn Beck.

Washington Post might of had a insider and was faster confirming and posting this news about "W.H. collects Web users' data without notice" collecting info off websites. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...s-data/?page=2
I have to say Glenn Beck was searching for the info first on the same subject. He just wanted to make sure he had the facts right before some group called him a bull crap reporter.

Seriously, Greg, do you smoke crack laced super marijuana whilst drinking turkish coffee to get this mind numbingly nonsensical and paranoid?

Not only is the story, brought to you by Glenn Beck, a fabrication and filled with untruths, the user data that the site was "stealing" was the same information that any site using analytics code takes.

"ZOMG!~ Teh Guberments tryin to steelz ma secretz wit der yoozer log & truckin cookiez! Betta vote fer dem Repelicans next time!"

[tas38]

Glenn Beck is pretty computer dumb and his viewers, must be as dumb as he is, we all know about cookies and all that stuff. So only dumb people would by into that one, and they had 3 people talking about it for how long.


Rush was once talking about how much danger energy saver lights was, and how we needed to be very worried about throwing them away. And how he would not be using them, and that the old lights had much better light anyway.

[Gregcyber]

Originally Posted by tas38

Glenn Beck is pretty computer dumb and his viewers, must be as dumb as he is, we all know about cookies and all that stuff. So only dumb people would by into that one, and they had 3 people talking about it for how long.


Rush was once talking about how much danger energy saver lights was, and how we needed to be very worried about throwing them away. And how he would not be using them, and that the old lights had much better light anyway.

An ENERGY STAR qualified compact fluorescent light bulb (CFL) will save about $30 over its lifetime and pay for itself in about 6 months. It uses 75 percent less energy and lasts about 10 times longer than an incandescent bulb.http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=cfls.pr_cfls



Humans use mercury in a variety of manufacturing processes and products such as thermometers and fluorescent bulbs. If you improperly dispose of products with mercury in them, they may break and release mercury vapors which are harmful to human and ecological health.

• Dispose of used mercury-containing items properly.
• Clean up mercury spills properly and report them to the proper authorities when necessary.

Mercury or CO2, Where is Al Gore?

Mercury in your drinking water?

[H2FC]

Originally Posted by tas38

Glenn Beck is pretty computer dumb and his viewers, must be as dumb as he is, we all know about cookies and all that stuff. So only dumb people would by into that one, and they had 3 people talking about it for how long.


Rush was once talking about how much danger energy saver lights was, and how we needed to be very worried about throwing them away. And how he would not be using them, and that the old lights had much better light anyway.

I hope somebody is saving all the lying crap the GW skeptics/climate change and alternative energy deniers have been putting out in the last few years. They spit this stuff out for a while like the dumb asses they are and then quickly move away from it after it becomes obvious they are ignorant of the true facts.

[DomainsInc]

Originally Posted by Gregcyber

An ENERGY STAR qualified compact fluorescent light bulb (CFL) will save about $30 over its lifetime and pay for itself in about 6 months. It uses 75 percent less energy and lasts about 10 times longer than an incandescent bulb.http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=cfls.pr_cfls



Humans use mercury in a variety of manufacturing processes and products such as thermometers and fluorescent bulbs. If you improperly dispose of products with mercury in them, they may break and release mercury vapors which are harmful to human and ecological health.

• Dispose of used mercury-containing items properly.
• Clean up mercury spills properly and report them to the proper authorities when necessary.

Mercury or CO2, Where is Al Gore?

Mercury in your drinking water?

It will only be a matter of time before led lights will replace cfl's. they are even more efficient and no mercury.

[draggar]

Originally Posted by Gregcyber

Mercury in your drinking water?

Ever eat fish? All fish has mercury in it. The larger the fish, the more mercury (larger fish are generally predatory that eat other fish). Salmon, some trout, shark, swordfish, tuna, mahi-mahi, grouper, just to name a few.

[tas38]

Your right there is only a tiny bit of it in energy saver lights, and even if you put them all out in your trash, it's many times less bad then all the electric normal lights use.

They are burning mostly coal to make the electric, and that has all kinds of stuff in it, people should see how much damage it has done already. To water ways and land, that not counting all the stuff put into the air even.

Edited In:

I will also add this, they had the junk coal piled all over the place, and it done a lot of damage to water and land, but now they burn that super dirty coal. That has to be putting out way more stuff into the air, I don't think many people know that, and our gov't is letting them burn it at that. They claim it's to clean it all up, all that bad stuff they left do damage years ago, but now burning it is doing much more damage through the air.

[Gregcyber]

The point about your post is?
You claim Rush Limbaugh lied and is unreliable news source.

Rush was once talking about how much danger energy saver lights was, and how we needed to be very worried about throwing them away. And how he would not be using them, and that the old lights had much better light anyway.

Your delusions about Obama and his administration are so bad your are claiming Fox News and Rush tell nothing but lies.