He has terminal cancer, and there seems to have been a deal to obtain a release on that ground in exchange for dropping an appeal, which was ordered by a Scottish conviction review commission.
However, and I have no opinion on this at all, there seems to be a dispute over the evidence used for the original conviction:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ers-guilt.html
Apparently, the conviction of Megrahi hinged on an eyewitness ID by the Maltese shop owner several years after the alleged purchase of the clothing.Lockerbie: relatives of victims divided on subject of convicted bomber's guilt
...
But it cast doubt on some of the evidence that helped convict him – in particular the purchase of clothing in a shop in Malta before the bombing.
Fragments of the clothing were found in the suitcase that contained the bomb, and Megrahi was said to have been the purchaser on December 7 1988.
But the Commission said new evidence suggested it was bought at an earlier date, when there was no evidence Megrahi was in Malta.
Former Labour MP Tam Dalyell believes Megrahi was no more than a sanctions-buster, and that the bombing was instigated by Iran in revenge for the accidental shooting down of an Iranian airliner by the warship USS Vincennes in July 1988.
More stuff here: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n12/mile01_.html , but from the various news reports, there seems to be a contingent of victims relatives who are quite convinced that Megrahi was not involved, and that the focus on Libya was influenced for political purposes. I don't know.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...industry.libya
Weird stuff.The key piece of material evidence used by prosecutors to implicate Libya in the Lockerbie bombing has emerged as a probable fake.
Nearly two decades after Pan Am flight 103 exploded over Scotland on 21 December, 1988, allegations of international political intrigue and shoddy investigative work are being levelled at the British government, the FBI and the Scottish police as one of the crucial witnesses, Swiss engineer Ulrich Lumpert, has apparently confessed that he lied about the origins of a crucial 'timer' - evidence that helped tie the man convicted of the bombing to the crime.
But what strikes me as odd is that after the review commission found there was enough for an appeal and the proceeding started, Megarhi drops his appeal and is then released. Sounds like someone made a deal.











Bookmarks