How to stop global warming fraud: flag the Al Gore robots!

[jasdon11]

The german rocketry and jet engine programs were far beyond what either the US or Soviet Union had going, and had we not gotten the best of the lot, the Soviets may very well have won the cold war.

There was a winner...?

[JMJ]

Operation Paperclip (also Project Paperclip) was the code name for the 1945 Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency[1] O.S.S.[citation needed] recruitment of scientists from Nazi Germany to the U.S. after Victory in Europe Day.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Paperclip

[Compassion]

Okay, so Eisenhower was a fascist.

A banking company had Germany among its hundreds of customers? Shocking

A Texas oil family had dealings with the largest construction company in Saudi Arabia? Appalling

So, let me see if I have this right...

After commanding Allied forces in Europe, Eisenhower decided to have fascists start NASA in 1958 so that, 50 years later, NASA could be promoting a lie about global warming in order to discourage consumption of fossil fuels for the benefit of a family that makes money from oil.

The moon landing was of course fake, right?

No I think we went to the moon in the 1950s, if not before. After all it is less than 300k miles away, the fascists really wanted to get there and the rocket technology to do so was available long before 1969. 300k miles is a distance many of us surpass in our lifetime of driving.

NASA is merely a vehicle to smokescreen the truth

What good would world domination be if you let the public know all the important stuff?


A textbook may say Venus is a raging ball of sulfuric acid, does this mean you should believe it?

Who do you think the fourth astronaut was who died in Apollo 1


What do you think this anomaly on the moon could be?



Notice the above anomaly on the left side.

[DomainMagnate]

meh, I was reading this thread hoping to see some interesting evidence to support or discard the Global Warming, but it seems everything can be and is questionable in here. Real, indisputable facts are rare to come by.

[jberryhill]

A textbook may say Venus is a raging ball of sulfuric acid, does this mean you should believe it?

Having done considerable work in optics in grad school I have, in fact, seen the far-IR absorption spectrum of the Venusian atmosphere with my own two eyes.

No I think we went to the moon in the 1950s, if not before. After all it is less than 300k miles away, the fascists really wanted to get there and the rocket technology to do so was available long before 1969.

Rocket technology? You disappoint me. After all, we got those UFO motors off of the one that crashed in Roswell in 1949, didn't we?

In fact, I saw these when I was working on contract with 3k4n4-21- 5po58888438orilk..ro[.hb[[imnm.rt.t///jjoj)(*j*$*-23

I was reading this thread hoping to see some interesting evidence to support or discard the Global Warming

Clearly if I had a question about the consensus scientific hypothesis about something, I would go to a domain forum...

[Marketing Guru]

meh, I was reading this thread hoping to see some interesting evidence to support or discard the Global Warming, but it seems everything can be and is questionable in here. Real, indisputable facts are rare to come by.

Anything can be disputed. Reasonably disputed is another thing.

- MG

[jberryhill]

That thing on the moon, by the way, is the Aristarchus crater.

It shows up on the lunar map made in 1651 by Giovanni Riccioli, and the name was officially adopted by the International Astronomy Union in 1935.

People have been looking at it through telescopes for hundreds of years, so if it is your secret German moonbase, then they've been there since the Holy Roman Empire.

Wait, wait, don't tell me... let me guess. Regardless of the fact that people have been looking at the moon through telescopes since Galileo, and mapping and cataloguing lunar features, something "new" of that size and visibility showed up in the mid twentieth century and nobody noticed.

Is that it?



Your "anomaly" is located along the "Nodus Orient", just under the "C" in "Oceanus".

Here's Riccioli's lunar map:



Because the Aristarchus crater has an exceptionally high reflectance, Riccioli even showed it in a brighter color.

I hope next you'll thrill me with the "suppressed" transcript of what Neil Armstrong really saw on the moon.

If you are going to propose a conspiracy theory based on events in the last hundred years, try not to use "evidence" that's been visible for longer than that.

[Compassion]

Rocket technology? You disappoint me. After all, we got those UFO motors off of the one that crashed in Roswell in 1949, didn't we?

In fact, I saw these when I was working on contract with 3k4n4-21- 5po58888438orilk..ro[.hb[[imnm.rt.t///jjoj)(*j*$*-23

I'd love to talk about anti-grav technology.

All indications point to the ability to get to the moon in just a couple of hours through scramjets and antigravity technology. These vehicles can travel at very fast speeds due to zero drag from gravity.



see: aurora project



What do you feel about such technologies?

What about Nikola Tesla?








Back on topic...global warming.


If you so feel inclined, take 10 or 20 minutes to share with us what you think global warming is, basically 'what global warming means to you'

All opinions welcome.

through this supreme act of transparency, a more distinct scientific analysis can be theorized as to the SCIENCE of climate change.

POLITICS and SCIENCE are two totally different things mind you. Sadly they have been lumped together as if they are interchangeable.

[DomainMagnate]

Clearly if I had a question about the consensus scientific hypothesis about something, I would go to a domain forum...

Obviously, but doing "real" online research takes time, reading a thread not as much.
I do consider domainers a clever bunch also

[Marketing Guru]

In fact, I saw these when I was working on contract with 3k4n4-21- 5po58888438orilk..ro[.hb[[imnm.rt.t///jjoj)(*j*$*-23

Personally, I quit contracting for 3k4n4-21- 5po58888438orilk..ro[.hb[[imnm.rt.t///jjoj)(*j*$*-23 when I discovered they only pay in dilithium crystals.

[Compassion]

That thing on the moon, by the way, is the Aristarchus crater.

It shows up on the lunar map made in 1651 by Giovanni Riccioli, and the name was officially adopted by the International Astronomy Union in 1935.

People have been looking at it through telescopes for hundreds of years, so if it is your secret German moonbase, then they've been there since the Holy Roman Empire.

Wait, wait, don't tell me... let me guess. Regardless of the fact that people have been looking at the moon through telescopes since Galileo, and mapping and cataloguing lunar features, something "new" of that size and visibility showed up in the mid twentieth century and nobody noticed.

Is that it?


Your "anomaly" is located along the "Nodus Orient", just under the "C" in "Oceanus".


Because the Aristarchus crater has an exceptionally high reflectance, Riccioli even showed it in a brighter color.

I hope next you'll thrill me with the "suppressed" transcript of what Neil Armstrong really saw on the moon.

If you are going to propose a conspiracy theory based on events in the last hundred years, try not to use "evidence" that's been visible for longer than that.

Don't make such presumptions.


I feel it to be much more likely the structures **cough..I meant 'anomalies' on the moon have been there far far longer than just the most recent hundreds of years, perhaps tens of thousands or perhaps millions of years is a more sensible consensus when comparing the time frame of the last hundred years with the age of the planet.


I don't pretend to know what is on the moon.

One can only conceive of the clearest version of the truth as it is most obtainable with top level access and something more obtainable to commoners...an open third eye.

Everything is an atom or empty space. The rest is opinion

[jberryhill]

One can only conceive of the clearest version of the truth as it is most obtainable with top level access and something more obtainable to commoners...an open third eye.

One can also spend the better part of a decade obtaining a doctorate in electrical engineering and actually working with some of the best minds in an advanced area of technology - including, yes, NASA - and obtain a pretty good understanding that folks who go on about "antigravity technology" and think that Nikola Tesla invented secret free energy devices among the other woo that is attributed to him, is utter bunk.

But, no... the guy who never spent a day actually learning and practicing engineering can understand this stuff much more clearly because he's "special".

Oh, so there you go... I spilled the beans.... Yes, I confess to having done engineering research under a Northrup/NASA funded project, so I guess I'm just one of the conspirators.

I should go back to engineering. It was more fun than having to run around the planet paying off people to hide all of Barack Obama's foreign birth certificates under the guise of going to ICANN meetings.

[Compassion]

One can also spend the better part of a decade obtaining a doctorate in electrical engineering and actually working with some of the best minds in an advanced area of technology - including, yes, NASA - and obtain a pretty good understanding that folks who go on about "antigravity technology" and think that Nikola Tesla invented secret free energy devices among the other woo that is attributed to him, is utter bunk.

But, no... the guy who never spent a day actually learning and practicing engineering can understand this stuff much more clearly because he's "special".

Oh, so there you go... I spilled the beans.... Yes, I confess to having done engineering research under a Northrup/NASA funded project, so I guess I'm just one of the conspirators.

I should go back to engineering. It was more fun than having to run around the planet paying off people to hide all of Barack Obama's foreign birth certificates under the guise of going to ICANN meetings.

Nikola Tesla didn't invent 'Tesla technology' he simply remembered something that has always been with us.



I don't think people in NASA are bad and if its compartmentalized anything like the other pyramid structure organizations, much of the really good stuff is hidden - is it hidden?


Or is NASA 100% transparent and run as a round table environment?



I'm constantly studying a wide range of topics from multiple modes of examination.

Finally, I've figured out exactly what to study to get where I want to be.....





We don't invent/create anything, we make use of all that already exists.

In Sanskrit there is no word for 'create' based on this principle.

[jberryhill]

I'm constantly studying a wide range of topics from multiple modes of examination.

I had a suspicion you were unemployed.