View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
View Friends
View Blog Entries
So, I guess we're out there to steal it, huuu?Originally Posted by theinvestor
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!
Yep, that's right...
Google it...or ask Raider.
So, I guess we're out there to steal it, huuu?
Right - we're there to protect the resources from being used as a weapon and as blackmale against us and the world. I guess you don't mind if Iran takes control of all middle eastern oil. Come on, don't be a moron.
acesfull are you God?
do you play one on TV?
since when do you have rights over other people or other countries?
Does the USA have to step in and act like they're the boss during every confrontation between other countries?
We buy energy resources from other countries, and we pay an extremely heavy price. The USA does more to help others than anyone else, in the US and in other countries, and protecting resources is good for everyone who needs them. We don't invade countries to steal their resources. I'm sick of idiots who always bash America, and never want to talk about the good things America does.
When did i bash america?
I am simply presenting new information. If you disagree that's fine. I disagree with 95% of the threads posted in the politics section that are meant to bash other candidates.
Every nation has a right to protect the resources it needs to survive and unfortunately much of the energy we need comes from the middle east.
Now if we could only drill for more oil here we wouldn't have to insert ourselves in so many conflicts. That will never happen with the nutty liberals in Congress.
Poorest excuse ever.....
Even a country as liberal as France understands that nuclear is the clean, safe way to go.
Acegoet
for sale: g9y.com, FastDropShippers.com, OhioRiver.org, BarnSigns.com, CouponClerk.com, MyOutdoorGear.info
i think you and chris mathews are putting words in his mouth.
yes, when genocide occurs.Does the USA have to step in and act like they're the boss during every confrontation between other countries?
BobGuzzo.comdomains.
I could agree with you here...
If I was a complete idiot.
I am reluctant to go with this ***umption saying that is an Admission:
Here is the context:
My friends, I will have an energy policy that we will be talking about, which will eliminate our dependence on oil from the Middle East that will - that will then prevent us - that will prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East.
He has a plan and that plan is for energy independence. We can read so much into those words. And all our assumptions are most likely right but those powers that be will not admit it.
I am all for a plan to keep us out of any future conflicts in the Middle East and I am sure the Middle East would love to keep us out.
But I would really be more interested in know how in the hell and when are we going to get out of the current conflict.
I am opposed to partial truths. Here is the follow up when asked about those remarks:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0...i_n_99866.html
"No, no, I was talking about that we had fought the Gulf War for several reasons," McCain told reporters.
One reason was Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, he said. "But also we didn't want him to have control over the oil, and that part of the world is critical to us because of our dependency on foreign oil, and it's more important than any other part of the world," he said.
"If the word `again' was misconstrued, I want us to remove our dependency on foreign oil for national security reasons, and that's all I mean," McCain said.
"The Congressional Record is very clear: I said we went to war in Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction," he said.
Now, we can all jump up and say that he is an idiot for believing there were WMD's. But he is 100% correct in saying that is why we went to war. WMD's is what the American people and our legislators were sold on.
That WMD myth was quickly debunked and more and more truth shall emerge on the selling of a war.
"Just a lot of embarrassment, embarrassed to be part of group of domainers who would do this to their fellow man.",
Condemnation of Mobee boys and investors by our precious Mother Theresa of Domaindom
You're the idiot. My statement is true of all nations whether you like it or not.
So when can we expect Canada to be invaded?
So this is your admission that you believe Iraq and Afghanistan are about oil, and not terrorism?
Drilling for oil, or starting conflicts?
DNGazette.com - for sale
I don't what is worse, your direct personal attack or ridiculous statement which you believe as unquestionable truth.
You are saying that every nation has the right to invade other countries in order to gain necessary resources?
he is clueless virtual....
They'll never need to. Under NAFTA Canada is required to send a guaranteed amount of oil and gas to them no matter what. If we cut back on production and delivery, we have to cut back on our own national consumption by an equal amount.
They tried to get the Mexicans to sign the same proportionality clause - but they told them gringos where to go. Mulroney and Poutine were not as bright in this regard.
So imagine that the year is 2040 - oil and gas are running out in Canada, prices are rising, Canadians are freezing and want more oil and gas kept here to curb prices - nope not going to happen.
Vote Obama my American friends - he wants to reopen NAFTA - and many of us Canadians want it too - and we will fight to have this clause removed, with the obvious peril of frothing rightwing Americans believing they can then just come and take it. But they should remember history and remember what happened last time they invaded us.
Zombie Movie Bong of the Dead - Get it on DVD or via Digital Download Today! ~ "This is a sure winner." - Tommy Chong
I said protect not invade that's your words. All I was saying is that all nations including the US look after their best interests. As a nation we can't afford to not to have access to resources in the middle east. Their vital to are survival and way of life. If someone were to cut those resources off we would take military action. Even a president Obama would have too.
Don't be so paranoid. Its silly to even think that the US would invade Canada.
Last edited by Donald Aquilano; 11-03-2008 at 07:01 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks