If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!
But then they would have no head line 'confirmations' of who has been killed for their political benefit and not enough people would be able to profit off of the fallen souls...Originally Posted by tas38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afwzu8JT7TE
It's all about business, thats why our government is so f***ed...
Last edited by Mike Cruz; 10-24-2009 at 10:40 PM.
So very true zurc, and don't forget it's oil as well.
Tim S.
Again, sitting on the sidelines, you have come up with a solution to a problem without devising how to arrive at that solution.
Where do the troops come from.
What was Bush's political agenda for sending them there, and pulling them out, and taking even more out last year?
So don't spew the political agenda or bad timing nonsense...
what was the political agenda for trimming them down to a pittance of a force to fend for themselves to begin with?
Once more, why weren't these same questions asked and answered by you and the other amercians who profess to be concerned now???
Do you think the taliban and Al qaeda grew stronger when we had a strong force over there? Or did they grow stronger when they were away of their numbers dwindling.
Why pretend to be concerned now? Where was your concern one year, two years, three years, five years ago?
Why pretend the problem exists now and at no other time.
"Just a lot of embarrassment, embarrassed to be part of group of domainers who would do this to their fellow man.",
Condemnation of Mobee boys and investors by our precious Mother Theresa of Domaindom
Ain't that the truth! AMEN!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PynWTLeUJRA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl_QUZBUyLE
Last edited by Mike Cruz; 10-24-2009 at 11:49 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
>>> What was Bush's political agenda for sending them there, and pulling them out, and taking even more out last year? <<<
It was to put a big oil pipe line worth mega billions, he pull them out because they could not stablize the country, so the banks pull out of the deal that was put together when they went in.
>>> what was the political agenda for trimming them down to a pittance of a force to fend for themselves to begin with? <<<
They felt Iran could get control over the Iraqi oil fields, the pipe line deal went down the toilet, so they worried Iran could turn the tables fast. And move more to Iraq to insure that did not happen, also Iran was looking like they could change the funds use to trade oil.
Meaning the USA would of been in very bad shape, they was forced to take action to keep it from happening. But now they stop it have they done anything, to keep it from happening again by getting us off all import oil. No they have not done much at all, in fact new numbers say a lot less people, now believe there is man made global warming.
Tim S.
For the mentally challenged, here it is again.
Many prominent Democrats, who hold office today, agreed and declared that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
In fact, they gave the OK to send troops to Iraq.
Area52 you are right, they was mislead because they was spineless or wanted to be, and did not push them to show the real facts. And I'm pretty sure some knew the real facts, and lied just like the rest of them did.
Tim S.
Doc Com...
I have had my own blog on the Iraq war...since 2007. While Iraq is the main focus...Afganistan, Iran, Pakistan and more middle nations are talked about. Each post 'hand posted'. Over 2,000+
I just did not jump on this truck "with this thread" on a domain forum.
Peace!
Dan
Thanks Area52,
Here...take a look at some old video(s)
This is not my "blog"... But it shows you what "Vile" left radicals are ALL about!
http://davidbetrayus.com/
A NASTY HILLARY CLINTON:
http://davidbetrayus.com/tos.html (You Will Notice SHE SAID AL QJada WAS IN IRAQ IN 2002
____
Peace!
Dan
The word: DEMOCRATS come to mind?What was Bush's political agenda for sending them there, and pulling them out, and taking even more out last year?
Doc...we are just going to have to agree to disagree..
Peace!
Last edited by companyone; 10-25-2009 at 09:49 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
So, Mccain IS doing this for the money, and this is something that hurts internet users not helps them.
Why am I not surprised.
I've been posting and writing about this for far longer but that does not make me right.
Agree.
Just like the defending of Bush pardoning Scooter Libby.
Treasonous acts.
"Just a lot of embarrassment, embarrassed to be part of group of domainers who would do this to their fellow man.",
Condemnation of Mobee boys and investors by our precious Mother Theresa of Domaindom
exactly
Misled by who Tim?
If you voted for our current President in 2008 to prove you weren't a racist,
please vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you're not an idiot. Thank you
Just an FYI - this act just modifies a law already in place.
The library of congress has the changes here:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:2:./temp/~bdnL7j:@@@L&summ2=m&|/bss/d111query.html|
It looks like the FCC's proposition would put them in control but this act would put the ISPs in control. It looks like a loose-loose situation for us.SUMMARY AS OF:
7/31/2009--Introduced.
Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2009 - Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to set the policy of the United States regarding various aspects of the Internet, including access, consumer choice, competition, ability to use or offer content, applications, and services, discriminatory favoritism, and capacity.
Makes it the duty of each Internet access service provider to: (1) not block, interfere with, discriminate against, impair, or degrade the ability of any person to use an Internet access service; (2) not impose certain charges on any Internet content, service, or application provider; (3) not prevent or obstruct a user from attaching or using any lawful device in conjunction with such service, provided the device does not harm the provider's network; (4) offer Internet access service to any requesting person; (5) not provide or sell to any content, application, or service provider any offering that prioritizes traffic over that of other such providers; and (6) not install or use network features, functions, or capabilities that impede or hinder compliance with these duties.
Requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to promulgate related rules.
Prohibits construing this Act to prohibit an Internet access provider from engaging in reasonable network management.
Requires the FCC to: (1) promulgate rules to ensure that an Internet access service provider does not require a consumer, as a condition on the purchase of any Internet access service, to purchase any other service or offering; and (2) take certain actions, including regarding private transmission capacity services.
Last edited by draggar; 10-26-2009 at 05:48 AM.
Save the wolves - join The Wolf Army today!
Please follow the rules or suffer the wrath of Thor's Hammer.
Well seeing as how the FCC is pushing for net neutrality and the ISP's want to make money providing faster access for whomever fills their pockets the most, I think we'd rather the former.
True - don't forget the fact that some ISPs are already sending you to "suggested" (parked) pages if the URL doesn't resolve - or is blocked by them.
My ISP (Comcast) is doing it and I've tried to opt out several times with no luck.
Save the wolves - join The Wolf Army today!
Please follow the rules or suffer the wrath of Thor's Hammer.
>>> Misled by who Tim? <<<
Misled by the lairs that said Iraq had weapons of MD, we never did find out who all was behind the lies about all that, and I'm sure we will never know.
For me I think bushes side kick dick pushed the lies, and bush trusting him went along with it, bush was not the smartest guy so that could of been the case. It would also tell us why, bushes side kick dick is still defending, some thing that can't be defended.
----
Last edited by 500,000; 01-11-2011 at 07:14 PM.
...
Last edited by companyone; 10-26-2009 at 07:52 PM.
I think people need to wake up, and see we are losing our rights left and right. The gov't has used 9/11 and terrorism as a means to do it, before that no one would let gov't/incs take control of stuff.
Intel was going to make a CPU, that could ID the system and the back lash was very big. They soon canned any such thing, but now the gov't can openly just ask our ISP's, for our records of what site and stuff we done and they give it to them.
We have the right to keep the stuff we do in private private, unless they can get a court order with some proof a crime has taken place. Forcing controls on us after we paid ISP's, to give up our hookup to the internet, is taking our rightful control over, when and what we do online away from us.
One day people will wake up and see they lost all their rights, but then it will be to late to get them back. You must fight to keep them, or you will lose them it's that simple, the internet is open and needs to stay that way. Saying they don't have the resources at time, is a lie when all they have to do is upgrade to get them.
Tim S.
You might consider more protein in your diet. Too much corn will turn you into a slobbering idiot.
Then you would constantly rant that Obama is god because Bush wasn't.
LOL. I couldn't have described the Obama administration any better. The Lord do work in mysterious ways.
Last edited by Area52; 10-27-2009 at 03:15 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Posting Permissions
View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
View Friends
View Blog Entries
Bookmarks