The main reason we have seen no action yet from other countries is simple, they believe the economy and the world is a safer place with him in charge of Libya, that simple.
Dictator or not the road that country would take (his opposition) is clear, Islamic rule, right now that is not a government that anyone besides Iran would smile about. The fact may very well be that a dictator who has seemed to slow down is a better option. I think it is sad but speaks volumes as to the way Islamic rule is perceived by most of the world.
Keeping new terrorism, human rights and the economy in place means allowing a dictator to rule, harsh as it may sound it is why everyone is sitting on their hands. In fact not to many weeks ago a hadnful of british special ops were KIDNAPPED by the opposition when they dropped in to help (later released). I had to laugh when CHINA voted for a no fly zone over Libya... hello pot, meet kettle, how don't the rest of the UN members not throw up when they witness that.
Personally I would have to take the side that preserved the most lives. That may mean leaving a dictator in place, jmo.
















...

Bookmarks