Obama’s Muslim Advisers Block Middle Eastern Christians’ Access to the White !!!

[Bill F.]

The political situation is complicated, as Gee said. And Christians are in a very precarious position there, with no real friends in power.
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Patri...ton-22768.html

And Gee has a big stake in all this, so I would give him a little more latitude in his opinions than I would someone who is just talking. The US has pumped tons of money into Egypt for decades, and it will always be a hotbed of foreign interest, if only for the canal. So nobody can deny that there is huge foreign (mostly American) influence in the country, and it's difficult for Americans especially to imagine being so dominated by foreign powers. Not saying that Egyptians aren't responsible for their own country, but you can't deny the impact of the US. It might be worse for Christians there were it not for US influence, but foreign influence of that sort is never 100% benign.

[Gerry]

The political situation is complicated, as Gee said. And Christians are in a very precarious position there, with no real friends in power.
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Patri...ton-22768.html

I do not doubt that for one minute.

But, having given all of his anti-U.S. rants including the previous thread wanting US citizens to sign a petition...at some point all of this becomes simply non-sense.

And then for an Egyptian to post a piece of anti-christian/pro-muslim literature by a Breitbart sponsored gibberish as if it were official white house policy is laughable. Not laughable because he posted it but laughable that such propaganda would be mainstream in the middle east. And mainstream for one reason and one reason only - to portray obama as a friend of the muslim and an enemy to the christian.

And Gee has a big stake in all this, so I would give him a little more latitude in his opinions than I would someone who is just talking.

I can do that even with the Breitbart monkey on my back all the while continuing to be amazed at those who take everything at face value vs. the truth. This Rahi person almost seems like a wolf in sheep's skin - he is pro-hezbollah in that he does not believe hezbollah should disarm and spouting some borderline anti-israel talk (always contentious no matter what side you are on) and supports giving Assad "more time" to institute his changes. I do not understand a man of the cloth saying other than asking Assad for the total cessation of all hostility and firing upon his own people.

His speeches and follow up stanch of continuing to stand by what he says is totally and entirely against US foreign policy.

This sounds like a friend of the US and warrants a meet-up with the president?

He can hope for and ask for a meeting all he wants but that does not open the door let alone set up a meeting with the prez.

[Raider]

Let Gee do his own translation from Arabic to English.

What would be the point? you've done nothing but discredit Gee in this thread, digging up garbage like a rat from previous threads and attacking his character, And now you want him to translate for you? You wouldn't believe a word of that translation, Just like you didn't believe a word of what came out of Obama own mouth when he said electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket under HIS plan of a cap and trade system, The YouTube video I posted just wasn't credible according to Father Gerry's standards, Everyone including the media took what Obama said out of context, only Doc was able to interpret what he actually said

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgilZCnA2F4


ALL of you are wasting your time proving anything to him, whatever proof you post will NEVER be good enough... And if the proof is irrefutable, he'll run away from the thread never admitting he was wrong, it's NOT in his makeup to do so.

those who take everything at face value vs. the truth.

You know your describing yourself here don't you?, this is EXACTLY what you've done when you;

took the spitting incident at face value vs the truth.

took the word of Colon Powell at face value vs the truth

took the racist charge against the Tea party at face value vs the truth.

took the media's version of Paul Reveres ride at face value vs the truth.

took Gabrielle Gifford's shooting as a Right wing hate crime at face value vs the truth.


TRUTH is only important when it's a conservative making a charge against a Liberal, that's when he wants proof handed to him on a silver platter... But when the Liberal media throws out a LIE he believes that LIE without hesitation and without checking the FACTS. That comes later on a Google search when he's called out on it.