World may not be warming, say scientist

[H2FC]

I cannot say what I'm saying any clearer than I did in #130 and #137.

I maintain that co2 can and does contribute to the greenhouse effect that in turn causes more global warming whether it precedes temperature rise or not. You say that's impossible but you're wrong and obviously don't know what you're talking about. This is a proven fact recognized and agreed with by even the most skeptical skeptics. It's beyond argument and if you would take the time to study the issue you wouldn't make such silly claims.

I often find the skeptics in here wrong in many of their posts concerning MMGW. For instance look at what the 3 zero guy said in response to my post about a wood burning fire, "H2 you sly dog, you figured out how to exploit hydrocarbon chemical energy with no CO₂ byproducts. The combustion control system must have been a tough nut to crack. Thanks for breaking the good news here at DNF instead of in some stodgy science journal. Big oil will have to pay through the nose to license your patents. Congratulations, you earned it. We'll be up to our ears in ice before we know it. MMGW RIP".

I know he's just trying to be cute but how he relates his assertion to my post is beyond me. But even if it did relate he's totally clueless about the subject as proven by the fact that someone else already owns such a patent.

And BTW....my signature is true and I'll stick with it as long as I wish. I may change it from time to time but it won't be because you or the other skeptics claim it to be false.

[jasdon11]

I maintain that co2 can and does contribute to the greenhouse effect that in turn causes more global warming whether it precedes temperature rise or not. You say that's impossible but you're wrong and obviously don't know what you're talking about. This is a proven fact recognized and agreed with by even the most skeptical skeptics. It's beyond argument and if you would take the time to study the issue you wouldn't make such silly claims.

Then you're too dumb to realise what you wrote or understand my comment.

I often find the skeptics in here wrong in many of their posts concerning MMGW. For instance look at what the 3 zero guy said in response to my post about a wood burning fire, "H2 you sly dog, you figured out how to exploit hydrocarbon chemical energy with no CO₂ byproducts. The combustion control system must have been a tough nut to crack. Thanks for breaking the good news here at DNF instead of in some stodgy science journal. Big oil will have to pay through the nose to license your patents. Congratulations, you earned it. We'll be up to our ears in ice before we know it. MMGW RIP".

I know he's just trying to be cute but how he relates his assertion to my post is beyond me. But even if it did relate he's totally clueless about the subject as proven by the fact that someone else already owns such a patent.

Seems a lot of things are beyond you...

And BTW....my signature is true and I'll stick with it as long as I wish. I may change it from time to time but it won't be because you or the other skeptics claim it to be false.

You couldn't prove it's true or even prove where you got that figure - it's just more of the propaganda use and yours use to try and convince the gullible.

[H2FC]

Then you're too dumb to realise what you wrote or understand my comment.



Seems a lot of things are beyond you...




You couldn't prove it's true or even prove where you got that figure - it's just more of the propaganda use and yours use to try and convince the gullible.

Ok jasdon I'm through with you. You're being added to my ignore list along with the other uninformed skeptics whose only purpose in responding to the MMGW posts is to deny the truth and insult the messenger.

[jasdon11]

Ok jasdon I'm through with you. You're being added to my ignore list along with the other uninformed skeptics whose only purpose in responding to the MMGW posts is to deny the truth and insult the messenger.

Insults? You're the one who called me a clown - all I did was state you were a liar, and the reason for me doing so was that you use figures in your posts (and signature) that you cannot back up. That's a fact. If I was going to insult you, I'd probably call you a conceited, self-righteous, pompus prick - or something like that...if I was going to that is.

Anyway, I'm not suprised one bit about you choosing to ignore comments from the sceptics, because you've buried your head in the sand about every fact that doesn't support the mmgw conspiracy theory.