It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

DNforum.com - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals
 
Register Now!
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our forums. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:  
Birthday:       I agree to forum rules 

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Domain News, Beginners Guides and Legal Stuff! > Legal Issues
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2008, 03:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
DNF Member
 
Salient's Avatar
 
Name: Stuart Wood
Last Online: Today 11:49 AM
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 540
DNF$: 5,437
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Country:


Arrow Anyone notice the Tinkerbell.com decision?

Firstly, I completely understand why the majority of UDRP cases go to the complainent - most of these are blatant TM issues.

Did anyone catch the decision from a single panelist on the UDRP for Tinkerbell.com?

Tinkerbell.com

The respondent was even found to have registered the domain in bad faith but the complainent failed to prove the respondent was using the domain in bad faith.
__________________
|Salient Properties, LLC. - Virtual & Real Estate| See Our Domain List|
|BuildsOut.com - We Develop Domains, Content, SEO: Higher Revenue|
Salient is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-04-2008, 04:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Last Online: Today 08:09 PM
iTrader: (68)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,019
DNF$: 6,823


Very interesting decision. Respondents deserve more wins like that one.

P.S. The http://tinkerbell.com website is weird. Not sure what purpose it serves.
trader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 04:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
Acro.net Αdministrator
 
Acro's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 05:56 PM
iTrader: (365)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,112
DNF$: 15,828
Location: Domainistan
Country:



Peter Pan cries in shame
__________________

Acroplex.com • Professional Web & Graphics development
Acro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 05:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: Today 08:41 PM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 764
DNF$: 437
Location: Ottawa
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by trader View Post
Very interesting decision. Respondents deserve more wins like that one.

P.S. The http://tinkerbell.com website is weird. Not sure what purpose it serves.
Haha, i love the site. Its what half the web looked like back in 1997.
DomainsInc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 05:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
DNF Newbie
 
cyberlaw's Avatar
 
Last Online: 09-22-2008 04:37 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
DNF$: 256
Location: Washington, DC
Country:


His site is for his wife. Great win there, beating the powerful Disney.
__________________
Eric Menhart - CyberLaw P.C.
http://www.cyberlaw.pro
Remember: Any comments are "general" in nature, and should not be relied upon as legal advice.
cyberlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008, 05:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
JB7
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 03-19-2008 09:15 PM
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 120
DNF$: 609
Location: US
Country:


Wow, that music had me at hello....Did you guys register too?
JB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 PM.
Copyright @2001-2008 DNForum.com

Learn Domains
Promote Domains
Research Domains
Buy Domains
Resell Domains
Park Domains
Sell Domains
Build Domains
Host Domains
Trademark Domains
Domain Domains
manage Domains
Appraise Domains