If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Don't shoot the messenger lol
Like I said I think more always has to do with a losing defense in such a case and the transfer of ownership alone ( perhaps showing bad faith ) is just one of 2 or more reasons
Look at it this way, it isnt the nail in the coffin but rather the pillow lol
Personally, I am more of the 'devil's advocate'. While it's understandable that things like that depend on a case by case basis, it's obvious that certain things apply across the board. It's also understandable that attorneys don't share information freely, however generic it might be. At the same time, in my opinion, the original poster asked a simple question that wasn't given a proper answer until I stirred the waters somewhat
I just like to argue lolOriginally Posted by Acro
Personally, I am more of the 'devil's advocate'.
Rather than start another thread I'll post this here. If I have a domain and trade mark ,would someone stand a chance with a later issued trade mark to take domain from me ?. Similarily, do UDRP panelists takle any note of geographic and class limitations of trade marks ?. i.e. if I have trade mark in UK and someone else has, for arguments sake, earlier mark in USA who would succeed under UDRP or is there no hard and fast ruling ?.
DG
Posting Permissions
View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
View Friends
View Blog Entries
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks