Valuate Domain Names
DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
HomeRegisterMembershipsGetting StartedDomain Tools Domain EbooksSEO Software Domain Resellers Advertise

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Domain News, Beginners Guides and Legal Stuff! > Domain Name Legal Issues
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-2009, 08:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
domaingenius's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 11:07 AM
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,027
DNF$: 148
Location: United Kingdom
Country:


Cetrification rule in WIPO procedures

I have noted the following clause in the WIPO response form;

VIII. Certification
(Rules, para. 5(b)(viii), Supplemental Rules, para. 12)

[9.] The Respondent agrees that, except in respect of deliberate wrongdoing, an Administrative Panel, the World Intellectual Property Organization and the Center shall not be liable for any act or omission in connection with the administrative proceeding.


Surely this kind of blackmails the Respondent into agreeing or otherwise
his response will not be heard ?. I can accept that a Complainant might
have to agree because he is a willing party, but a respondent is NOT
a willing party.

I cannot find anywhere in the UDRP that specifically states that a
domain registrant has to agree to waive all rights of recourse against
WIPO ?. Lawyers may know ?.

DG
domaingenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads
Old 01-16-2009, 07:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
dvdrip's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 04:26 PM
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,651
DNF$: 13,895
Location: Athens Greece
Country:


It does say:
Quote:
Originally Posted by domaingenius View Post
except in respect of deliberate wrongdoing
__________________
www.bluepixel.gr I like .info!
Now accepting .gr domain registrations from any foreign company or individual. Contact me for details.
dvdrip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 10:49 AM   #3 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
domaingenius's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 11:07 AM
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,027
DNF$: 148
Location: United Kingdom
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdrip View Post
It does say:
Yep but very hard to prove.

I was advised that it is up to the respondent if he accepts the
supplemental rules contained in the response form ,
and even of he doesnt his response will NOT be rejected
and considered as valid. The question therefore is, why
is it not highlighted by words "you can choose whether
or not to accept the supplemental rules and if you choose
not to accept it will nit in anyway prejudice your response" ?.

DG

"not" , not "nit". lol.

Last edited by domaingenius; 01-17-2009 at 10:50 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
domaingenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.
Copyright @2001-2009 DNForum.com