It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

DNforum.com - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals
 
Register Now!
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our forums. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:  
Birthday:       I agree to forum rules 

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Domain News, Beginners Guides and Legal Stuff! > Legal Issues
Start your Domain Reseller Business Today and Earn Money!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2002, 11:34 AM   #1 (permalink)
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 06-20-2006 11:09 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 57
DNF$: 29


Co. trademarked my name after I turned down offer

Quick facts:

I registered zride.com Jan 9, 2002

They registered zride.net on July 17, 2002

They sent me an offer for the name as well as filed to trademark "Z RIDE" on July 29, 2002

I turned down the offer of $150 and countered with $3500 which was turned down.

The offered $200 today and also stated they "have a federal trademark for the work Z RIDE"

So my question is, how does the trademark affect my ownership of zride.com since I registered the name 7 months before they filed for trademark?

Thanks for any info!
reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-13-2002, 12:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 12-01-2005 11:02 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 224
DNF$: 1,216
Location: Davie, Fl


You win!! They cannot prove that you registered the domain in bad faith. If anything - you could bring an action against them for trading on your good name - even though it hasn't been trademarked.
__________________
Howard Neu, Esq.
HOWARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2002, 12:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 06-20-2006 11:09 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 57
DNF$: 29


One other thing to note, I hold the zride.com name and have it parked currently with development underway but no site up yet. Would this make a difference?

Last edited by reed; 11-13-2002 at 01:37 PM.
reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2002, 04:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User - Must Upgrade To Post
 
DomainPairs's Avatar
 
Last Online: 03-12-2007 06:01 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,392
DNF$: 582
Location: England


Can't you ask them to stop using the net domain.
DomainPairs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2002, 04:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 02-11-2004 01:21 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 170
DNF$: 242


A decision was recently issued on this very issue. Take a look at Picoliter.com, http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/122205.htm

This decision should be right on point with your facts. FYI- the panel found reverse domain name hijacking in the case as well.
pljones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2002, 11:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
adoptabledomains's Avatar
 
Last Online: 04-19-2008 03:47 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 776
DNF$: 1,515
Location: Ohio, USA
Country:


Look at their trademark at uspto.gov and see what catetory it's registered in. You should have a right to use the domain, but probably not in the category in which they hold the trademark. It looks like their trademark is in the sports/bicycle category. If that was your intent, they probably Trumped you with the trademark. However, if you sell auto shocks or horse saddles, you may be okay.

Your site will likely get accidental hits from theirs, being the superior dot-com. It could be really ebmarassing for them if your site led to porn, gambling, or something else they didn't want their customers to see, but did not infringe on their legal trademark. How about the "Zride condom"...maybe the Zride vibrator? I'll bet that would motivate to purchase closer to the price of a WIPO/UDRP filing.

(See whitehouse.gov vs. whitehouse.com)

Worse than a true cybersquatter (not speculator) is a reverse hijacker.

Good Luck.
__________________
Mark
AdoptableDomains.com
~ Providing Good Homes for Good Names ~
adoptabledomains is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2002, 11:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Last Online: Yesterday 09:59 AM
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,621
DNF$: 7,475
Location: Planet Earth
Country:


Now you can say you consulted with several attorneys.

You're a big shot now.
Fearless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2002, 11:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User - Must Upgrade To Post
 
Last Online: 06-17-2003 09:02 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 467
DNF$: 986
Location: Mexico


>Can't you ask them to stop using the net domain.

Cough, hack, I'm sorry?

Are you saying we should dismantle the multiple-TLD system because the owner of the dotCom has rights to all other TLD's?

Up here for thinking!
Drewbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 12:05 AM   #9 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Last Online: Yesterday 09:59 AM
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,621
DNF$: 7,475
Location: Planet Earth
Country:


I had a company try get a TM for my exact domain name, Yada.com, after I turned down their offer. They ended up buying yadayada.com and blew through a bunch of VC before fizzing out.
Fearless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 12:08 AM   #10 (permalink)
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 06-20-2006 11:09 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 57
DNF$: 29


Wanted to say a big THANKS for all the info and comments so far, I do appreciate the help.
reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 12:50 AM   #11 (permalink)
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 08-26-2008 11:34 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,315
DNF$: 440


Quote:
Originally posted by gregr
...and blew through a bunch of VC before fizzing out.
Ouch! Careful how you use that word please gregr

Very informative thread BTW - thanks guys.
fizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2002, 07:12 AM   #12 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 09:11 AM
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,629
DNF$: 5,842
Location: Florida


Quote:
Originally posted by gregr
I had a company try get a TM for my exact domain name, Yada.com, after I turned down their offer. They ended up buying yadayada.com and blew through a bunch of VC before fizzing out.
Great Lack of Success story! Justice sometimes prevails
__________________
DNJournal.com Howe About That! One Man's Rise From Low Budget Domain Flipper to Million Dollar Dealmaker
NameNewbie.com - The Beginner's Guide to Making Money With Domain Names
Duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2002, 05:09 PM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User - Must Upgrade To Post
 
DomainPairs's Avatar
 
Last Online: 03-12-2007 06:01 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,392
DNF$: 582
Location: England


If you can manufacture a vibrator that plugs into the usb port and call it the Z ride. I'd like to sign up for your affiliate program please.
DomainPairs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2002, 08:36 PM   #14 (permalink)
Philadelphia Lawyer
 
jberryhill's Avatar
 
Last Online: 08-25-2008 03:07 AM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,353
DNF$: 3,139


"Now you can say you consulted with several attorneys. "

One of the things that most ethics codes encourage attorneys to do is to promote public education about the law. While things like this forum, radio call-in shows, etc. are one way that attorneys can fulfill this objective, you should not mistake such public discussions for legal consultation, and most certainly should not claim that you have had such consultation.

While specific questions provide a useful jumping-off point for explaining relevant principles it is unwise to consider such a public discussion as legal advice. If I were an attorney for the other side reading this forum, and if you obtained specific advice in this forum and then engaged that attorney for further work on the matter, I would certainly claim that you had waived your privilege and could very well be successful in obtaining other correspondence you held with that attorney in that matter.

On the attorney end of things, there are also malpractice issues which bear on giving specific advice in public fora. Assuming an attorney-client relationship gives rise to specific duties... 'nuff said.

Once again, with feeling, what is often missing from what seems to be the "no-brainer" scenario of a registration application filed after your domain registration is whether there are any facts that might suggest the registrant had reason to be aware of a perfectly enforcible common-law claim that pre-dated the application. In the present example, and since I'm too lazy to look it up right now, the registrant does not state whether the application is an intent-to-use application or a use-based application.

It may very well be an "easy case", but disputes such as eresolution.com and efads.com were lost by the domain registrant on similar facts. And whether one considers paying hundreds of dollars for a three-member panel in order to obtain a "no-brainer" decision is a "win", is something of a subjective judgment. Unlike the picoliter.com case, which involved a generic designation for a unit of volumetric measure, a Panel may want to know why you registered the domain name, if as noted above, there might be some suggestion that you had reason to know of a pre-existing common law mark. Maybe there are, maybe there aren't, but if it matters to you then you should consider consulting an attorney.
__________________
John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
John-AT-johnberryhill.com
Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.
jberryhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2002, 10:28 AM   #15 (permalink)
Philadelphia Lawyer
 
jberryhill's Avatar
 
Last Online: 08-25-2008 03:07 AM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,353
DNF$: 3,139


You might like this line from a UDRP opinion which was posted at the WIPO site today:


"Furthermore, Complainant's waiting to file this Complaint until after it had obtained a United States service mark registration a few months ago (though it claims to have used the name "Windsor" since 1939), with full knowledge that Respondent had registered the disputed domain name in 1995, some seven years earlier, smacks of deception and an attempt to manipulate the Policy. "

Decision at:

http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/deci...2002-0839.html
__________________
John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
John-AT-johnberryhill.com
Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.
jberryhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2002, 11:08 AM   #16 (permalink)
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 06-20-2006 11:09 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 57
DNF$: 29


Great info, thanks for the link!
reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
140 .CNs Super Sale - PIN.cn & More alia Domains for Sale (Domain Sales) - Fixed Prices Above $100 3 02-11-2004 12:47 AM
three letter domains taz Domains for Sale (Domain Sales) - Fixed Prices Above $100 0 10-09-2003 10:40 PM
DomainLoft Clearance Sale - $50 and up! dloft Domains for Sale (Domain Sales) - Fixed Prices Above $100 7 10-03-2003 11:41 AM
Big sale of .info & .biz one-word domains.Bulk discounts bruno Domains for Sale (Domain Sales) - Fixed Prices Above $100 5 05-28-2003 06:22 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 PM.
Copyright @2001-2008 DNForum.com

Learn Domains
Promote Domains
Research Domains
Buy Domains
Resell Domains
Park Domains
Sell Domains
Build Domains
Host Domains
Trademark Domains
Domain Domains
manage Domains
Appraise Domains