If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!
Complainant Got A Real Spanking
Just finished reading this UDRP decision from my email:
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/d...2006-1392.html
All that supplemental filings and they still lost.
Vidi, Vici, Veni!
Amazing. The domain was registered in 1998, the complainant filed a trademark in 2006 and still thought they had the rights to the domain simply because, well...because they thought so.
Also impressive that it was before a panel of three. I wonder how much laughing went on behind closed doors when they were deliberating?
You're right, Dave Zan, the complainant needs a real spanking but they would obviously enjoy it.
"Just a lot of embarrassment, embarrassed to be part of group of domainers who would do this to their fellow man.",
Condemnation of Mobee boys and investors by our precious Mother Theresa of Domaindom
I don't think they actually "deliberate".
I think they use the 'coin flip' system majority of the time.
Two of the panelists were women. The mind boggles
Now if that isn't a case of "Attempted Reverse Domain Name Hijacking" I don't know what is.
Granted, they didn't find the complaintant, but still.
I think the coin flip is for a panel of one (that still does not ring right..."a panel of one").Originally Posted by -X-
I believe the proper protocol for a panel of three is the "paper, rock, scissors" mandate.
Surely your not implying some "deliberate" spanking behind closed doors?Two of the panelists were women. The mind boggles
I believe blatantly so. I would love to see this play out in a real court where the complainant has to act out or provide evidence of such a claim. I think I just wrote a script for their next film project with that statement?
Last edited by Gerry; 02-12-2007 at 10:45 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
"Just a lot of embarrassment, embarrassed to be part of group of domainers who would do this to their fellow man.",
Condemnation of Mobee boys and investors by our precious Mother Theresa of Domaindom
Low-life reverse domain hijackers like that cause the prices of aftermarket domains to go UP.
I've got more where these came from!
I'd be suprised if the panel kept a straight face through that.
Oh boy.Browsers looking for “spanking material” may well use the same or similar words to search for such content.
John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
John-AT-johnberryhill.com
Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.
Another "generic term" wins, although site is parked.
Courteous and Respectful DNForum Member!
Text Link Ads WhyPark.com - Stop Parking Your Domains - Society's Problems - PM me to Post your Opinions
Posting Permissions
View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
View Friends
View Blog Entries
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks