It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

DNforum.com - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals
 
Register Now!
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our forums. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:  
Birthday:       I agree to forum rules 

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Domain News, Beginners Guides and Legal Stuff! > Legal Issues
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-04-2005, 04:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
JuniperPark's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 08:02 PM
iTrader: (56)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,749
DNF$: 780
Location: San Diego, CA
Country:


This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

I got a phone call today (no prior contact) from someone claiming he owns the TM to a name I'm using. He essentially just said I'm "on notice" and "what do you intend to do about it?". I said I would look it up at the USPTO and get back to him.

This is a 2 word English phrase, somewhat commonly used for many years. The TM is on file (filed 5 years ago), and is specific to "publishing self help law books".

Yes, that's where this may get interesting - he (claims) to be a famous published author of self help law books covering topics including TM law!

Among other things, he told me that "trademark owners are always entitled to the related domain name", and he "has never heard of any case to the contrary". I pointed out that this rather broad phrase has many uses, and mist of my buyers are not even in the USA; his reply was that his little specific use described in his TM filing entitles him to all possible uses, all around the world.

More facts:
- A British legal firm owns the .NET, all other extensions remain unregistered.
- A US based lawyer owned the name 2 years ago, until this guy called and threatened him and the name was simply dropped.
- Amazon lists him as the author of 8 books, 6 out of print. 2 have the term in question as a subtitle, both out of print.

- He hasn't specifically told me what he wants me to do with the name, but if I ask I want that in writing. If he wants it dropped (yet again), he's not protecting his mark. If he wants to own it, he's attempting a reverse hijack. If he wants me to notify potential buyers of his mark, I'm fine with that.

He ended the 1 hour call with "I'm sending you a letter and I intend to pursue this".

I'm considering putting up a very hard (and very public fight) on this.

Your thoughts?
__________________
The only domain reseller BRAVE enough to post prices: TheNameStore.com ][
JuniperPark is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-04-2005, 04:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
Alleged Cybersquatter
 
nameslave's Avatar
 
Last Online: 10-07-2008 06:57 PM
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,438
DNF$: 971
Location: Toronto, ON
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniperPark
He ended the 1 hour call with "I'm sending you a letter and I intend to pursue this".
You spent an hour on the phone with a stranger?
__________________
Nameslave - Knows a thing or two about domain names
nameslave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2005, 04:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
JuniperPark's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 08:02 PM
iTrader: (56)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,749
DNF$: 780
Location: San Diego, CA
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Lawyers love to talk, and he was saying some things that I can use against him
__________________
The only domain reseller BRAVE enough to post prices: TheNameStore.com ][
JuniperPark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2005, 05:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
DNF Member
 
Salient's Avatar
 
Name: Stuart Wood
Last Online: Today 11:49 AM
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 540
DNF$: 5,437
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Any good lawyer would have never called. He would have hired a lawyer and sent it in writing. He may be serious, but he was trying to bully you with the phone call.
__________________
|Salient Properties, LLC. - Virtual & Real Estate| See Our Domain List|
|BuildsOut.com - We Develop Domains, Content, SEO: Higher Revenue|
Salient is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2005, 07:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Steen's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 10:01 PM
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,854
DNF$: 1,808
Location: White Rock, BC
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JuniperPark
Lawyers love to talk, and he was saying some things that I can use against him
Recorded?
__________________

Get an eNom resellers account free and instantly,
click here - Automated Signup!
Steen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2005, 07:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
JuniperPark's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 08:02 PM
iTrader: (56)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,749
DNF$: 780
Location: San Diego, CA
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steen
Recorded?

Not legal in California without consent, and not useful because audio recordings are now easy to edit.
__________________
The only domain reseller BRAVE enough to post prices: TheNameStore.com ][
JuniperPark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2005, 08:42 PM   #7 (permalink)
DNF Member
 
Salient's Avatar
 
Name: Stuart Wood
Last Online: Today 11:49 AM
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 540
DNF$: 5,437
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

I thought the law was one party had to be aware the call is being recorded? Thats how cops bypass the tapping laws, by having a second party agree to call and have the call recorded. Kind of like Amber Frye with Scott Petersen.
__________________
|Salient Properties, LLC. - Virtual & Real Estate| See Our Domain List|
|BuildsOut.com - We Develop Domains, Content, SEO: Higher Revenue|
Salient is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 01:16 AM   #8 (permalink)
tnt
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 04-07-2005 10:36 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 16
DNF$: 137


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Is this lawyer suggesting that because he used a couple of common words, he's automatically entitled to the domain in every extention?

I want "TNT" in every extension. I've been using it for 45 years. It goes back even further, because my daddy always planned that his second born son have the initials "TNT."

Trademark laws are so screwed in the US. I wonder if a company that makes replacement windows would have gotten to windows.com if they'd have had a problem?
tnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 02:19 AM   #9 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Steen's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 10:01 PM
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,854
DNF$: 1,808
Location: White Rock, BC
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salient
I thought the law was one party had to be aware the call is being recorded? Thats how cops bypass the tapping laws, by having a second party agree to call and have the call recorded. Kind of like Amber Frye with Scott Petersen.
Some states require one party to know the call is recorded, some require both parties to know. I bet it gets sticky when Iowa calls Florida on a conference call with Washington g
__________________

Get an eNom resellers account free and instantly,
click here - Automated Signup!
Steen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 02:41 AM   #10 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
gworld's Avatar
 
Last Online: 06-03-2008 04:28 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 90
DNF$: 234


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

I don't know what the words are but if USPTO has granted him a trademark then he has it. You should ask yourself if this domain name is really that important for you to pick up a fight since if you are using the domain in a field that is related to his trademark, he can file a complain with ICANN and most likely he will win.

He can then use the ruling from ICANN to sue you in a civil court for damages.

To go to ICANN will cost him about $2000 for the filing fees plus lawyer costs, so why not talk with him that if he really wants this domain he can pay you for your costs (as long as it is reasonable) and get it.

It is never a good idea to get in to a fight that you do not know the out come and over nothing.
__________________
ChicDogs.com Search, Auction, Shopping and Software.
Tune Auto Directory of all automobile related sites.
gworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 02:44 AM   #11 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
GT Web's Avatar
 
Name: Daniel
Last Online: 10-11-2008 07:08 PM
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,909
DNF$: 9,089
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Quote:
Originally Posted by gworld
I don't know what the words are but if USPTO has granted him a trademark then he has it.
Not true.

Although I dont have much legal experience, I know that this isn't always enough to give the complaintant the victory in a WIPO dispute.
__________________
GT Web is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 09:14 AM   #12 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Name: Dave Zan
Last Online: 10-09-2008 10:49 PM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,626
DNF$: 0
Location: Manila


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

What an interesting story, JuniperPark! Do keep us posted.

Have you emailed any of the attorneys here for possibly more info on the guy?

I'm thinking he might use ACPA instead of UDRP in the hopes of running you
down with legal costs.
__________________
Dave Zan says Vidi, Vici, Veni! :-D
DaveZan.com - My Blog

Last edited by davezan1; 04-05-2005 at 09:18 AM.
Dave Zan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 09:53 AM   #13 (permalink)
 
JuniperPark's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 08:02 PM
iTrader: (56)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,749
DNF$: 780
Location: San Diego, CA
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salient
I thought the law was one party had to be aware the call is being recorded? Thats how cops bypass the tapping laws, by having a second party agree to call and have the call recorded. Kind of like Amber Frye with Scott Petersen.

Every US state is different. In most states, and in California, both parties must agree OR have a court-ordered wiretap. The Frye/Peterson calls were permitted because a court order was obtained in advance.
__________________
The only domain reseller BRAVE enough to post prices: TheNameStore.com ][

Last edited by JuniperPark; 04-05-2005 at 10:43 AM.
JuniperPark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2005, 10:07 AM   #14 (permalink)
DNF Addict
 
seeker's Avatar
 
Last Online: 07-10-2008 02:08 PM
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,175
DNF$: 7,245
Location: Athens
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

make a contract with someone overseas (that you trust).
Transfer the domain in question to them.
It would make going after the domain through US courts much more difficult, and he will probably want to skip WIPOing you
result=quick sale for a fait to both amount, assuming the domain's value is less than the hassle.
__________________
Seek... And you shall Find
seeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2005, 10:33 AM   #15 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 07-16-2008 10:18 PM
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 756
DNF$: 1,232
Location: Madison, WI


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Sounds like complete BS to me. When he says that a TM gives him a right to all domains with all extensions he is either outright lying or completely unfamiliar with the process. Either way it makes the likelihood that he'd get anywhere much less. And book titles, let alone subtitles, are extremely weak for establishing trademarks compared to other uses. I doubt he has a case at all, but then it would really depend upon the full details, which you probably don't want to post.
__________________
Dan Norder
Werewolves.com, Inklings.com, OtherWoman.com and more
namedropper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2005, 04:17 AM   #16 (permalink)
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 04-21-2008 07:18 AM
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
DNF$: 578


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

The unfortunate part of getting into a fight with someone who is his own lawyer is that your expenses will be a lot higher than his. Some lawyers actually enjoy situations like that.
DomainGoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2005, 04:41 PM   #17 (permalink)
tnt
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 04-07-2005 10:36 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 16
DNF$: 137


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Quote:
Originally Posted by DomainGoon
The unfortunate part of getting into a fight with someone who is his own lawyer is that your expenses will be a lot higher than his. Some lawyers actually enjoy situations like that.
Another old saw my daddy taught me was this: "A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client."

I'm sure many lawyers would argue with that, but I've read about it often enough in the local papers to believe it.
tnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2005, 07:42 PM   #18 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
jojoyohan's Avatar
 
Last Online: 09-28-2008 02:41 PM
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 352
DNF$: 1,838


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Wait for the letter. Because you didn't receive any instructions to date you have no obligation to do anything.
__________________
Terragen Forums jojoyohan
jojoyohan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2005, 11:11 AM   #19 (permalink)
The Bishop
 
namestrands's Avatar
 
Last Online: 09-16-2008 10:32 AM
iTrader: (109)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,804
DNF$: 2,115
Location: UK
Country:


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

Agree, saying that if he was going to do anything he should of served you by now and contacted the registrar and filed the UDRP...

If you are offering the domain for sale then he can argue bad faith registration, you may also need to prove your legal right in the domain.

But he has to File the UDRP at a Cost of $1500, and then needs to research and submit the complaint.

You dont have to pay a dime, however Lawyers are Slimy Bast***s and they will use every under handed method in the book. You just got to think like them..
__________________
Parked.com - The Valet Domain Parking That Pays
Offers Made Are Valid for 12 Hours from Post Time.
namestrands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2005, 01:11 PM   #20 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 12-01-2005 11:02 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 224
DNF$: 1,216
Location: Davie, Fl


Re: This could get interesting! Argument with a TM lawyer!

If you have a legitimate business use for your domain, so long as it is not confusingly similar to his trademark you are in good shape. Further, phone calls generally are not sufficient to make a case against you. Your best bet is probably to wait for the C & D Letter and then retain counsel.
__________________
Howard Neu, Esq.
HOWARD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On