Quote:
|
Hmmmm, a "certain decorum"?
|
Beats me what he's talking about. My "forum fee" is the right to be sarcastic and use foul language.
That said, my personal "sense" on lawyers participating on internet forums is that they should:
1. Use their real names,
2. Not comment on matters in which they are engaged without stating that fact,
3. Not purport to be advising a client,
4. Not solicit engagements or engage in other Rule 7 violations,
...but that's just me.
Also in general, I don't receive or respond to PM's on forums, since I do not know who else has access to those messages.
Quote:
|
Are there rule sections for lawyers?
|
The relevant ethics code of their jurisdiction. A number of bar disciplinary boards have in the past commented on the potential conflict between the aspirational admonition to participate in public activities to advance knowledge of the law, and things like "radio call in programs" in which a lawyer may discuss various legal issues at the prompting of someone who calls in with a question.
Internet forums are similar to the classic "radio call in program" scenario that has been the subject of such disciplinary board opinions - and there can be a fine line between answering questions "about" the law and answering specific legal questions. Also, whether that line is crossed can depend on the question.
For example, person asks:
"My neighbor is a jerk and I don't like him. I'm thinking of shooting him to death. If he's a really big jerk, is that okay?"
Now, if a lawyer says, "That would be murder, and you shouldn't do that" then has that lawyer provided legal advice to that person, or have they answered a general legal question - i.e. without valid legal justification, intentional homicide will generally be some form of murder.
Personally, I think it would be acceptable for the lawyer to opine on that person's proposed course of action.
In other situations, the questioner's situation may be one in which there is no dead-simple answer - i.e. killing your neighbor is murder - or in which for other reasons the questioner should not be "drawn out" into potentially damaging casual statements.
However, a lawyer cannot - cannot - cannot - provide you with legal advice on an internet message board, since doing so would be an immediate ethics violation and malpractice (for the reason that the lawyer has, upon rendering the advice, violated the duty to maintain your inquiry and the advice in confidence).