If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!The National Arbitration Forum just released its decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. World Readable c/o R.L. Cadenhead, the domain-name dispute in which the film studio tried to take Wargames.Com away from me because it owns a trademark related to the 1983 film WarGames and the upcoming sequel WarGames 2: The Dead Code.
My blog entry with more info:
http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/news/3119
The decision:
http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/...ons/868828.htm
Without attorneys Wade Duchene and Brett E. Lewis, I couldn't have won this dispute. If you're in a UDRP dispute or you fear you're going to get into one, I recommend them both highly.
Rogers Cadenhead
Workbench
Congrats on the win! Good job Brett!
Always buying .COM revenue type-ins. PM me!
Nice.
I don't mean to be a killjoy or whatever, but I'd suggest being careful posting
online about this matter. The other party can always go to Court if they so
choose, and even go as far as using your online posts against you.
In any case, congrats for the win. And kudos to Brett and Mr. Duchene.
Vidi, Vici, Veni!
Good decision, Congrats.
Well done mate.
Coming soon: ...............................MySiteIs.com
..................................Everyone's local site - Everyone's personal site
.................................................. .....
...
Cool! Congrats!
True.
The other party already has tried to do that -- MGM included several of my recent weblog posts in its additional complaint. I made the decision that I was going to wage this fight publicly on my blog and with any reporters who wanted to talk to me. My next book is going to be on how domain owners can protect themselves from UDRP grabs.
I'm building up a big UDRP category on my blog:
http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/tag/udrp
Rogers Cadenhead
Workbench
I think the first step is hiring a knowledgable attorney like Brett Lewis or John Berryhill.Originally Posted by rcade
Find a Dog Walker
Congratulations
Last edited by Creature; 02-08-2007 at 06:25 AM.
'Those who stand for nothing fall for anything' - Alexander Hamilton in 1978
You should definitely sell it to them now.
I'm buying credit, banking, loan, insurance related generics in .com, .net, .org with high search volumes/traffic. Will consider typos too! - PLEASE PM with name, info, & asking price!
If you read the decision, you will see that selling the domain name was never World Readable's intent. Also, offering a domain name for sale after winning a UDRP or litigation in court can be used as evidence of bad faith intent in a future proceeding (yes, it would likely constitute "new evidence" sufficient to support the filing of another UDRP over the same domain name). You essentially take a good faith use and make it look like a bad faith one.You should definitely sell it to them now.
Brett E. Lewis, Esq.
Brett E. Lewis, Esq.
brett@lewishand.com
Ok, but they are going to "have" to buy it...I love the whole "never intended it for sale" angle...like anyone really believes that crap! lol
I'm buying credit, banking, loan, insurance related generics in .com, .net, .org with high search volumes/traffic. Will consider typos too! - PLEASE PM with name, info, & asking price!
At the risk of sending you into convulsions, I've represented a number of clients who registered dictionary word domain names and never entertained the idea of selling to a trademark holder. When forced into a "fight or sell" situation, some clients will opt to sell, just to avoid the cost of litigating, and others sell because they see an opportunity to profit. I have had a number of clients, however, who refuse to sell, on principle. They registered legitimate domain names for a legitimate business purpose and actually want to be left alone to use them.I love the whole "never intended it for sale" angle...like anyone really believes that crap! lol
Brett E. Lewis, Esq.
brett@lewishand.com
Bookmarks