This is an example where money and influence moved the scale of justice.
And, this is confirmed by this one statement by the WIPO Panelist
"However, the present situation is far different and thus clearly justifies an exception."
I believe if he had a trademark lawyer he might have won the case. Or, in other words,
the production company would have lost the case.
Unfortunately, now a company can create a press release (factual or not) and say
henceforth they have common law trademark rights. And, they can cite this case as an precedent.
Moreover, once an idea or intentions of a business project is announced to that particular industry. That said company has implied exclusive rights to the name.
In reality, I'm sure he reacted to the press release. But, wasn't the production company negligent in releasing the show's name without beforehand registering the
domain name and initiating a TM filing? (In the corporate world, it is S-O-P to due the
standard due diligence before leaking any information on a future project.)
Dan, are there a number of rulings similar to this one?







Reply With Quote



Bookmarks