GeschÃ¤tzten Strandanzug Zuccarini - gegen - Toyota - Klassenkamerade - Vorhut

**PARTEI SCHULES** · 01-13-2003, 07:47 AM

Hallo besucht alle von Partei Schulen fÃ¼r alle Kontinente.

Ich habe gesehen, daÃŸ MÃ¤dchen am Strand und sie Kopien von Strand Prozessen fÃ¼r John Zuccarini gegen Toyota, gegen Klassenkamerade und gegen Vorhut gehabt haben.

Ich habe den Strand den MÃ¤dchen trugen gemocht anpaÃŸt und hat sie gefragt, wenn sie zur VerfÃ¼gung fÃ¼r private Partei in Hotel standen.

Privaten Parteien sind gut.

http://strandanzug.de

**pljones** · 01-13-2003, 08:19 AM

Someone please translate. I think this guy met some girls at the beach and they were talking about John Zuccarini and Toyota. He says private parties are good.

John must be living the high life in the Bahamas.

**Ciqala** · 01-13-2003, 08:28 AM

babelfish comes up with this...

Babel Fish Translation, In English: Help

Klassenkamerade - Vorhut hello visits all of a party schools for all continents. I saw that girls at the beach and it copies of beach processes for John Zuccarini against Toyota, against Klassenkamerade and against Vorhut to have had. I have the beach the girls carried liked adapt and her asked, if they were available for a private party in hotel. Private parties are good.

though i'm at a loss as to how this is legal related?

**beatz** · 01-13-2003, 08:45 AM

This german post doesn't make any sense at all - looks like worst Babelfish translation.
What is interesting though are the links on that site - they lead you directly to the exact wordings of 3 Zuccarini vs. Toyota, Classmates.com and Vanguard countersuit cases; they try to fight 3 UDRP cases in court now, cases that Zuccarini had lost in UDRP.
Surprises me those documents are public available as they reveal the complete strategy of Zuccarini fighting a UDRP decision in court - btw it's a german court and german lawyer, so also interesting because of the international legal aspects.

**pljones** · 01-13-2003, 02:21 PM

OK, so hadn't actually looked at the website when I made my earlier post (Zuccarini sites can cause "pop-up hell"). My German is even worse than my Spanish, but the links do appear to show pleadings in three separate German lawsuits filed by Zuccarini. If anyone can come up with decent translations, and let me know if these are actually filed in a German court, then I'll add them to my UDRP-Court Challenge Database.

It is interesting that he's challenging these decisions in Germany (the location of his favorite registrar Joker), since I believe he still owes a few million in fines from several 3rd Circuit decisions. It must be rough living on the beach in the Bahamas outside of the reach of US law.

**Chelsea** · 01-13-2003, 02:42 PM

to pljones---
the reason that heÂ´s challenging these decisions in Germany is that he has no legal address for New Jersey and Georgia.
It is just too late now to read through all these legalities, but I shall have a look tomorrow.

**pljones** · 01-13-2003, 03:08 PM

Thanks Chase.

For some reason I think it might have more to do with avoiding US jurisdiction because of the earlier court decisions issued against him. It would be fascinating to hear something from him directly though....

**beatz** · 01-14-2003, 06:32 AM

Well these pleadings are indeed filed in a german court.
To translate the whole stuff would be a pain in the a** really, sorry

**HOWARD** · 01-14-2003, 07:53 AM

I represented Zuccarini and can tell you that he is a complete nutcase. If he won any of the German lawsuits, it was pure luck!
It was because of him that the courts have equated typosquatting with cybersquatting even though the ACPA doesn't provide for typosquatting as bad faith.

**JOHN ZUCCARINI1** · 01-14-2003, 10:46 AM

howard, are you INSANE

Are you out of your freaking mind, coming on a message board and talking about a former client.

Not that you have ever had a mind, the ethics or the knowledge to even take a case to federal court.

You are a COMPLETE JACKASS and always have been.

As I mentioned in my final letter to you "You are the biggest JACKASS ever to graduate from JACKASS UNIVERSITY."

God knows how you haven't been disbarred and you're only lucky I didn't file a malpractice suit against you.

Let me see, your advice to me that in order to file an appeal in a federal case, in reference to joe cartoon, I needed to pay $90,000 to the court after the initial decision was handed down.

WRONG - no money had to given to the court - An appeal can be filed without payment of the judgment to the court.

Would you like to send me the $90,000. Make it an even $100,000 with the interest.

Your failure to properly appeal the summary judgment so my appeal to the appeals court had no chance of winning on procedural grounds.

First of all if you read the German lawsuits they have just begun and no decision has rendered, but I do expect to win all them!

Indeed I have won a number of decisions in arbitration without you as my lawyer.

How could you have missed them.

And if we are to talk about luck in winning lawsuits, that is without a doubt the only way you have won a will ever win any in the future.

How you won the goofoff.com for Rick Schwartz prior to the passage of the ACPA act is truly a miracle and only that, as complete dumb luck! must have been in effect the day that decision was handed down!

It was evident by the time of the joe cartoon case that you did not know the first thing about the ACPA act as I had to repeatedly point out articles of the statute to you that you were not familiar with.

You are trying to blame me for typosquatting being equated with cybersquatting. Some how it has escaped you in your backward reasoning, you were the lawyer in the case.

Even though we know it isn't and the circuit court in Virginia said it wasn't in the Volkswagen case.

So I would say you were to blame for that, not me.

And howard, would I need to mention to you the biggest betrayal of all a lawyer can commit against his client.

I will actually spare you that here, but I can guarantee you, if this continues, that and much more will be said.

John Zuccaini

**Banned: consumernet** · 01-14-2003, 12:44 PM

x

**crabby** · 01-14-2003, 01:29 PM

This thread is getting good!

**DomainPairs** · 01-14-2003, 01:33 PM

Please could someone translate the "juicy" bits into english. It seems as if there are a few points that we should know about typo-squatting.

**pljones** · 01-14-2003, 02:16 PM

According to the 3rd Circuit in Shields v. Zuccarini, "typosquatting" is defined as "registering domain names that are intentional misspellings of distinctive or famous names....

"Although Zuccarini's sites did not involve pornography, his intent was the same as that mentioned in the legislative history above -- to register a domain name in anticipation that consumers would make a mistake, thereby increasing the number of hits his site would receive, and, consequently, the number of advertising dollars he would gain. We conclude that Zuccarini's conduct here is a classic example of a specific practice the ACPA was designed to prohibit. The district court properly found that the domain names he registered were 'confusingly similar.'"

So, the 3rd Circuit says typosquatting is covered in the ACPA.

I'd be really interested in seeing translations of the court cases filed by Zuccarini.

**DomainPairs** · 01-14-2003, 02:43 PM

Typo domains are interesting, and I've only just started to explore them. I bought hormy.com and I'm getting a few hits from that which is surprising as horny.com is undeveloped.

It must be difficult to prove type squatting though, if for example you had foord.com and used it to sell music to car owners, could Ford claim typo-squatting even if you are trying to sell to their customers.

**signguy** · 01-14-2003, 03:46 PM

on the outside chance john will read it........

i just couldn't resist this opportunity to also say

" john, no matter how you slice it....... you are a loser "

**beatz** · 01-14-2003, 03:50 PM

Uh what surprises me here are 2 things:

- How come those appeal wordings (in the initial post) have been put online at all ?

- To be honest i would not like to have my ex lawyer saying bad things about me in a public forum; i thought those things would be subject to some kind of business/nondisclosure ethics?

**Fearless** · 01-14-2003, 03:56 PM

Originally posted by beatz

- To be honest i would not like to have my ex lawyer saying bad things about me in a public forum; i thought those things would be subject to some kind of business/nondisclosure ethics?

Sounds to me like they didn't part on good terms.

**NamePopper.com** · 01-14-2003, 03:59 PM

*moderator looks around trying to figure out what is going on - and if anybody needs to be slapped upside the head*

*moderator can't decide what to do - so he kicks greg in the kneecaps*

**beatz** · 01-14-2003, 04:09 PM

Originally posted by gregr

Sounds to me like they didn't part on good terms.

Yeah but as this can *always* happen ( you never know) i would like to be sure that if this would happen ( not parting on good terms ) my ex lawyer would still be bound to some nondisclosure thing, or even better would not disclose anything simply just out of business ethics principles.