why woudn't the company (good will) just buy it in auction. obviously they were aware it was up for sale. after legal fee's and damages you would think it would have been easier or worth just buying it.
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!I can not understand why you are wrangling over this when the arguments you are presenting are PRECISELY the points FOR LOSING a judgement and LOSING the domain name.
Intangible assets vs. tangible assets - why cloud the issue? And if a domain name exists clearly to profit at the benefit of others, then that goes beyond infringement and fraud.
If someone who bought Goodwill.com, opened a store, put up a sign saying similar to the Goodwill Industries, and sold goods to the general public while posing as a charity...yeah, you can damn sure bet that they would be shut down, all goods seized, and most likely the property would be seized. All of those are assets.
IF someone was to set up a website using the name Goodwill and sold items on the site to people BELIEVING they were buying from Goodwill industries, I can also be willing to bet that more than just the domain name would be seized.
Again, it all boils down to intent.
You seem to be more on promoting domains as NON ASSETS.
As I mentioned earlier, most browsers know know the location of every viewer. The fear (if I owned this domain) would be if I did not have 100% total control on which ads appeared or did not appear...the fear would be an Adsense ad would pop up letting someone in San Jose know the location of the San Jose Goodwill store or in Lizard Lick Indiana know where the nearest good will is. Some may argue that this benefits Goodwill but that would be a hollow argument.
That is the bigger picture - how it is presented and perceived. Your "intentions" (or what you meant to do vs. what you actually did) is not going to carry much weight.
why woudn't the company (good will) just buy it in auction. obviously they were aware it was up for sale. after legal fee's and damages you would think it would have been easier or worth just buying it.
Because they are not in the business of buying things. They just want another handout.
I'm buying credit, banking, loan, insurance related generics in .com, .net, .org with high search volumes/traffic. Will consider typos too! - PLEASE PM with name, info, & asking price!
Why buy it when there are morons out there who will pay big bucks to infringe and give it to you for less?
Ah the irony, petty arguments and legal proceedings over 'goodwill'. Sums this entire industry up IMHO...
If the name was parked for a short period of time and infringing, this could quite conceivably be something which was automated, and the new owner could have not known it was the case for a day or two. If somebody is 'squatting' for a period of time, with clear intention to profit from another's mark, that is one thing, but if a tm holder is bidding on a generic keyword, which also happens to be the exact .com name in question, it is hardly surprising their ads showed up for the first day or two after auction... This one looks like reverse hiujacking to me on the face of it.
Contact me for 3 character.com domains.
My wager is the owner of the profitable goodwill.com has a better lawyer than the manager of the non-profit goodwill.com.
Always bet on the team with the best lawyers!
What was the person that had his last name, a major corporation, he couldn't use it but didnt have to give it up.
I mean if we trademark a word does that mean we get the .com?
Maybe goodwill should show some.
I thought that 'good will' was a legal term, referring to the good will tied up in any business dealing with the public. Over here in Ireland, at any rate, people will sell good will with a business premises that has been trading long enough to have formed a relationship with customers.
That does not matter since the key to the case and reason the non-profit will win is "after winning the auction, the lawsuit alleges that Cyber2Media parked the domain name with links related to charitable giving. Goodwill Industries claims this has caused severe damage since December is a busy month for charitable giving."
Even if the ads were only there for a short time it makes little if any difference.
Contrary to what some think large non-profits have top lawyers and large legal expense budgets. Don't let the charitable staus fool you.
Save the wolves - join The Wolf Army today!
Please follow the rules or suffer the wrath of Thor's Hammer.
But also, as regards parking with charity in mind, I know I've read several American novels (Ira Levin's The Stepford Wives being one of them), where newcomers to an area are visited by the local Good Will people, bringing cakes, etc. to help them when they are moving in. So that is charity-related and nothing to do with any corporate organisation.
Bookmarks