Welcome to Welcome to DNF.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars

If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    DNF Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    155
    DNF$
    5,328
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    5,328
    Donate  

    Google wins typosquatting dispute

    There are a ton of Google typos that aren't owned by Google. The article suggests that the Google targeted these domains because they were being used to distribute malware.

    Yahoo News - Google wins Typosquatting Dispute

    I was surprised that this was litigated in the National Arbitration Forum and not WIPO. Any insight into what this means for typos in general? What is the difference between the National Arbitration Forum and WIPO?

  2. #2
    Philadelphia Lawyer
    jberryhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,020
    DNF$
    6,642
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    6,642
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    NAF is normally faster and cheaper.
    John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
    John-AT-johnberryhill.com
    Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.

  3. #3
    DNF Regular

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    877
    DNF$
    5,832
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    5,832
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    Well, very scarey because now we have a name for it -- "typosquatting."
    The very foundation of the word "squatting" means there is no rightful or legal claim.

    Bad news for typos in my opinion.

    Quote Originally Posted by fredlucas
    There are a ton of Google typos that aren't owned by Google. The article suggests that the Google targeted these domains because they were being used to distribute malware.

    Yahoo News - Google wins Typosquatting Dispute

    I was surprised that this was litigated in the National Arbitration Forum and not WIPO. Any insight into what this means for typos in general? What is the difference between the National Arbitration Forum and WIPO?

  4. #4
    DNF Regular
    ParkQuick.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Narnia
    Posts
    944
    DNF$
    18,825
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    18,825
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    The word has been around for a while. To get the full effect, pretend you are an intellectual property attorney and add some sarcasm to your tone-of-voice.

    It sounds like Google made a good case that the domains in question were damaging it's image and damaging other computers. I'm not sure that all typos will end up getting treated the same way. In many cases they are not nearly as clear cut. Often a typo is also a real word, or it could be a typo for more than one word. In other cases, like Voyeur.com, it's generic enough that it was ruled to not be infringing (plus it was ruled that there was not even a real trademark to be in violation of).

    Quote Originally Posted by financialtraffic
    Well, very scarey because now we have a name for it -- "typosquatting."
    The very foundation of the word "squatting" means there is no rightful or legal claim.

    Bad news for typos in my opinion.

  5. #5
    Philadelphia Lawyer
    jberryhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,020
    DNF$
    6,642
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    6,642
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    To get the full effect, pretend you are an intellectual property attorney and add some sarcasm to your tone-of-voice.
    The better picture is from the movie _Coming to America_ where Mr. McDougal is explaining, "We're not McDonald's, we're McDougal's.... We don't have golden arches, we have golden arcs."

    If you didn't get the humor in that scene, and if you don't understand that this UDRP decision was a no-brainer, then you need to find something else to do instead of domains.
    John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
    John-AT-johnberryhill.com
    Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.

  6. #6
    Exclusive Lifetime Member
    SouthernTn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,329
    Country

    United States Add SouthernTn on Facebook
    DNF$
    778
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    778
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    Quote Originally Posted by jberryhill
    The better picture is from the movie _Coming to America_ where Mr. McDougal is explaining, "We're not McDonald's, we're McDougal's.... We don't have golden arches, we have golden arcs."

    heh, thats one of my favorite parts.. especially when there are photographers outside taking pictures.
    NerveWrecker.com - Vegetarian For A Week Challenge

  7. #7
    DNF Regular
    ParkQuick.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Narnia
    Posts
    944
    DNF$
    18,825
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    18,825
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    But you would acknowledge that not all "typosquatting" decisions will necessarily go the same way, right? I agree that this one was doomed from the start.

    Another question - Are domain registrants required to use the National Arbitration Forum if the disputant (or whatever the term is) starts an action there? Is that in the fine print somewhere? How does the process differ from WIPO? (Feel free to point me to a link for dummies...)

    Quote Originally Posted by jberryhill
    If you didn't get the humor in that scene, and if you don't understand that this UDRP decision was a no-brainer, then you need to find something else to do instead of domains.

  8. #8
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Manila
    Posts
    1,721
    DNF$
    7,963
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    7,963
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    Quote Originally Posted by jberryhill
    "we're McDougal's....
    It's actually "McDowell". :-D

    Quote Originally Posted by healingsites
    Another question - Are domain registrants required to use the National Arbitration Forum if the disputant (or whatever the term is) starts an action there? Is that in the fine print somewhere? How does the process differ from WIPO? (Feel free to point me to a link for dummies...)
    Why not read their respective sites?
    Vidi, Vici, Veni!

  9. #9
    The Bishop
    namestrands's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Langley, VA
    Posts
    4,053
    DNF$
    3,312
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    3,312
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    Quote Originally Posted by healingsites
    Another question - Are domain registrants required to use the National Arbitration Forum if the disputant (or whatever the term is) starts an action there? Is that in the fine print somewhere? How does the process differ from WIPO? (Feel free to point me to a link for dummies...)
    Yes you have to use the NAF if the complainant has filed with them.. however you do have the right to choose a three panel forum as opposed to one which most complainants got for.. The NAF is an arbitration forum that operates just like if not the same as WIPO in UDRP cases.

    typosquatting is a derogatory term

    also

    Other than individual domain name purchases, several attempts have been made by larger corporations to profit off of user typos by redirecting them without their knowledge.

    * Microsoft's Internet Explorer automatically redirects users' mistyped URL queries to their MSN Search page. Though a user can reconfigure their browser to use a different search tool, Google, MSN's biggest rival, is not in the list and a custom engine cannot be specified by the user.
    * Top-level-domain registrar VeriSign's Site Finder service automatically redirected traffic to URLs not registered by users. This caused a fair amount of outrage from the internet standards community, and an emergency patch to the BIND protocol was issued to circumvent Verisign's service.
    * Paxfire a startup company, sells partner internet service providers a tool that redirects mistyped queries to a Paxfire-generated page with sponsored advertiser content related to the mistyped "hotword". Revenue generated from user clicks is split between Paxfire and the internet service provider.
    Last edited by incipience; 07-09-2005 at 04:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
    Enterprise Communications and Social Media in Uist

  10. #10
    Bloody Hell
    Acro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,666
    Country

    Holy See
    DNF$
    15,567
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,567
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    Microsoft's Internet Explorer automatically redirects users' mistyped URL queries to their MSN Search page. Though a user can reconfigure their browser to use a different search tool, Google, MSN's biggest rival, is not in the list and a custom engine cannot be specified by the user.
    Actually, not true if you install the Google bar.

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog

  11. #11
    DNF Addict

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,481
    DNF$
    15,602
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,602
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    Quote Originally Posted by Cleo McDowell from Coming to America
    Look...me and the McDonald's people got this little misunderstanding. See, they're McDonald's...I'm McDowell's. They got the Golden Arches, mine is the Golden Arcs. They got the Big Mac, I got the Big Mick. We both got two all-beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles and onions, but their buns have sesame seeds. My buns have no seeds
    Classic!
    Sam
    --
    I'm just waiting 'til the shine wears off.

  12. #12
    Account Terminated
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    940
    DNF$
    7,576
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    7,576
    Donate  

    Re: Google wins typosquatting dispute

    Quote Originally Posted by FLe8
    Classic!

    I agree, my favorite part was when he arrives in Brooklyn, and his luggage is stolen by half of the people in the surounding neighborhood, and some guy walks up to them with their briefcase, and says can I interest you in a watch.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com