+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 41 to 48 of 48

Thread: I just got a name taken by WIPO :(

  1. #41
    Domain Network Developer
    Last Activity 02-09-2010 08:19 AM

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Marbella, Spain
    Country
    Posts
    177
    DNF$
    3,352
    Trader Rating: 0 reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by BobDiGiTaL View Post
    Tell me if this is fair.
    The name is "JardinasdePaz.com" which is translated "Gardens of Ease"
    I used the keyword "gardening supplies."
    Actually, it means "Gardens of Peace". And, I could see that that is more appropriate for cemetery and funeral services, rather than garden supplies, especially understanding the Spanish language and culture. A Spanish speaking person would never cognate that this would mean garden supplies.

    Bad luck.

    Sorry, this is mispelled, It is, correctly, Jardines de Paz.

    So, if the Claimant was claiming some sort of infringement on Jardinas de Paz, any Spanish speaking person could refute this claim, as Jardinas isn't even in the language.

    And no Spanish speaking person would ever call a funeral service Jardinas de Paz, because it is a nonsensical term....it means absolutely nothing.

    Normally, I am on the side of the TM holder, or owner of a long standing business covered by common law trademark or general usage. In this case, you were completely within your rights to keep the name, simply because there is no such word as jardinas.

    Sorry, mate, you were gamed.
    Last edited by steveatvillas; 07-24-2009 at 04:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
    The righter we do the wrong thing, the wronger we become.


  2. #42
    Platinum Lifetime Member
    Last Activity Yesterday 11:59 AM

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    270
    DNF$
    2,459
    Trader Rating: 0 reviews
    It might be different under Spanish trademark law, but the fact that there is no such word actually makes it more likely that a term would be protectable, not less.

    That doesn't mean that the seizure was not unfair, I take no position on that. But, the absence of a word in the operative language is, if relevant, a factor that weighs in favor of the complainant.
    Marc J. Randazza
    The Legal Satyricon
    No post should be considered to be legal advice.


  3. #43
    Gold Lifetime Member
    Last Activity 01-29-2010 09:54 AM

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bangor Pa
    Posts
    6
    DNF$
    43
    Trader Rating: 0 reviews
    I am not a domainer (but I like reading these forums). Just to clarify, Godaddy does take the $30.00, but if you win the UDRP Godaddy refunds the $30.00. In fact, the email I received on the refund was how I initially found out that the decision was made for my UDRP. The decision was emailed to Godaddy also and I am guessing that within 5 minutes, the refund email from Godaddy reached me.

    I am not saying I agree with the $30.00 charge, but at least they refund it if you win the UDRP.


  4. #44
    Bloody lovely
    Last Activity Yesterday 06:57 PM
    Acro's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Country
    Posts
    24,370
    DNF$
    5,810
    Trader Rating: 404 reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
    I am not a domainer (but I like reading these forums). Just to clarify, Godaddy does take the $30.00, but if you win the UDRP Godaddy refunds the $30.00. In fact, the email I received on the refund was how I initially found out that the decision was made for my UDRP. The decision was emailed to Godaddy also and I am guessing that within 5 minutes, the refund email from Godaddy reached me.

    I am not saying I agree with the $30.00 charge, but at least they refund it if you win the UDRP.
    That means GoDaddy is not charging that amount for "administrative purposes" only.

    In other words, GoDaddy assumes you're guilty before proven innocent and takes your $30.

    What a crock of shit.

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog


  5. #45
    www.nomzo.com
    Last Activity Yesterday 05:37 AM
    Nomzo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bristol/London
    Country
    Posts
    485
    DNF$
    1,612
    Trader Rating: 17 reviews
     
     
     
    I bet they were laughing their asses off when that was first brought up in a meeting. Then after about a minute, "Guilty fee, I like that. Can we do it?"
    Don't Wait - Develop Now! | Showcase | Sell in 7 Days (15% comm) | +44 117 230 1212

    Generic Domain Owners - Incredible Opportunity You can't Afford to Miss - nomzo.com/incredible


  6. #46
    Bloody lovely
    Last Activity Yesterday 06:57 PM
    Acro's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Country
    Posts
    24,370
    DNF$
    5,810
    Trader Rating: 404 reviews
    Tom, exactly.

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog


  7. #47
    Domain Network Developer
    Last Activity 02-09-2010 08:19 AM

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Marbella, Spain
    Country
    Posts
    177
    DNF$
    3,352
    Trader Rating: 0 reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by marcorandazza View Post
    It might be different under Spanish trademark law, but the fact that there is no such word actually makes it more likely that a term would be protectable, not less.

    That doesn't mean that the seizure was not unfair, I take no position on that. But, the absence of a word in the operative language is, if relevant, a factor that weighs in favor of the complainant.
    Not debating TM law, Spanish or otherwise, in this instance.

    What I'm saying is that no Spanish speaking person would use the word Jardinas, in any use, ever; cemeteries or garden supplies or Aunt Minnie's underwear (la ropa interior de Tía Minnie). Any more than an English speaking person would use the word HçtDøügs. Well, a typo domainer would, hehe.
    The righter we do the wrong thing, the wronger we become.


  8. #48
    Gold Lifetime Member
    Last Activity 01-29-2010 09:54 AM

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bangor Pa
    Posts
    6
    DNF$
    43
    Trader Rating: 0 reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by Acro View Post
    That means GoDaddy is not charging that amount for "administrative purposes" only.

    In other words, GoDaddy assumes you're guilty before proven innocent and takes your $30.
    Here are excerpts from the email. I have taken out any personal info.

    Dear John xxxxx,
    We recently received an inquiry related to your domain name, xxxxxxxxxxxx.NET, xxxxxxxxxxxx.NET. The specific inquiry related to your domain name can be described as follows:
    We have received notification that a legal complaint on the domain name(s) has been filed through the National Arbitration Forum, http://www.adrforum.com. Please contact domaindisputes@godaddy.com with any questions.
    In accordance with our registration agreement, https://www.godaddy.com/gdshop/legal_agreements/domain_registration_GD.asp?prog_id=GoDaddy&isc=gdb b135, we have charged your credit card in the amount of $29.00 for our processing of this inquiry.
    If you have any questions concerning the above, please contact our customer service center.
    Thank you for your continued business,
    GoDaddy.com
    And then after the dispute was settled

    Wednesday, August 05, 2009 8:38:31 AM


    Dear John xxxxx,

    GoDaddy.com has received a refund request for the following items:


    QTYITEMPRICE-1Administrative Fees - 29($29.00) xxxxxxxxxx.NET, xxxxxxxxxxx.NETSubtotal: ($29.00)Shipping & Handling: $0.00Tax: $0.00Total: ($29.00)



+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts