If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Unbelievable and disasterous decision.
Link to article:
http://www.dailydomainer.com/200750-...-for-mobi.html
Link to actual case:
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/d...2006-1479.html
Please pay particular attention to these items in the case:
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant further asserts that it wished to take advantage of the “sunrise” registration period for .mobi domain names in order to protect its mark. However, through what is said to have been an administrative error, there was a failure to register the disputed domain name during the sunrise period.
C. Additional Submission – Complainant
INC was not included in the Premium Name list produced by the global registry for .mobi domain names.
All of this matter placed in the hands of one individual.
Hon. Sir Ian Barker
Sole Panelist
Dated: January 19, 2007
That has to be as unfair a ruling as I've ever seen. Can't even imagine it was being used in bad faith.
i cant believe it........im not a reseller. im a mobile developer... completely not fair. thank you guys for your support. this shouldnt be unnoticed.![]()
::: www.MobileDesign.com ::: Mobile Website/App Design Showcase and Resources
Bad luck to the domain owner. Lost such a nice name.
this is highly unfair, i think you should make an appeal
there's also this thread about the same issue:
http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.ph...82#post1073482
Last edited by typist; 02-04-2007 at 08:06 PM.
always buying domains with type-in traffic. all tlds.
And this is where an experienced domain lawyer would come in handy. With that domain, I am shocked he had no representation. Unfortunately, this is one of the situations I always preach about. You must protect yourself, you must use the domain and establish rights. Do not sit on the "it's generic" defense. UDRPs are slighted against "perceived" squatters. Like it or not, that is the tuth. Remember.. usage usage usage... and not using a domain can hurt you.
I do believe it is a bad ruling and I hope the domain holder takes this to court because it does set a dangerous precedent for us.
Track emails that you send, PM me to find out how....
There is no appeal process, the next step would be court.
As far as generic words being rejected by the USPTO, that means there is no registered mark, that does not mean there is no TM. TM status can be obtained through common law. Since it cannot be registered does not mean there is no TM for it.
Track emails that you send, PM me to find out how....
Thank you all for your support. i have sent a simple email saying that i appeal it. Im supposed to have a lawyer represent me within 10 days, but it takes longer to get a lawyer in Japan. Im also quite confused with this.
http://www.dnjournal.com/legal/sl-genericdomains.htm
Just for the record, I sent pictures of my files with the dates stating that i was in the development stages.
Also, i "never" contacted the complainant. I know them with "magazine" and not by inc by itself, cause its generic. And they purchased incmagazine.mobi after i submitted evidence that they were not interested in inc.mobi.
What will become of this? My evidence that i sent was mostly thrown out of the window. Im not that rich as the complainant to afford an attorrney. I never thought that it would come to this situation. im pissed. really, really pissed. if i were to take www.me.mobi, then would Time magazine take that name away from me!?
Any advice would be appreciated.
The lawyer on this forum wasnt interested in taking this case, so i basically did it on my own.![]()
::: www.MobileDesign.com ::: Mobile Website/App Design Showcase and Resources
I think it's a bit late to get lawyers involved now. The expense of taking this to court will be massive...
It's a poor ruling and I feel for you, but you also should have done some of this preparation before the WIPO hearing.
Jon,
You have the support of other domainers on this forum and NamePros.
PM me for details.
I would definitely start an appeals process. I would be open to reasonable solutions offered by the other party as well. I would also be very careful what I say in forums in the meantime.
Last edited by Duckinla; 02-06-2007 at 01:07 AM.
Honestly, I don't have much of an idea. However, I know how expensive a lawyer's time is. I guess if you think the name is worth an easy $5000+ its worth it. But if you spend a few thousand on the appeal and don't end up winning it...yikes.
Does anyone know how many WIPO decisions have been appealed and subsequently overturned?
The chance of ever getting this domain back is basically none, sorry my friend..this was VERY unfair imo...you never know who's on who's payroll.
I'm buying credit, banking, loan, insurance related generics in .com, .net, .org with high search volumes/traffic. Will consider typos too! - PLEASE PM with name, info, & asking price!
Bookmarks