It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

DNforum.com - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals
 
Register Now!
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our forums. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:  
Birthday:       I agree to forum rules 

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Domain News, Beginners Guides and Legal Stuff! > Legal Issues
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Click Here
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2006, 05:41 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
POLiSH's Avatar
 
Name: Ryan
Last Online: 12-03-2008 10:44 PM
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,247
DNF$: 12
Location: High Mountains
Country:


Post Jury Awards $11 Million Over Defamatory Internet Posts

By Laura Parker, USA TODAY

(Oct. 11) - A Florida woman has been awarded $11.3 million in a defamation lawsuit against a Louisiana woman who posted messages on the Internet accusing her of being a "crook," a "con artist" and a "fraud."

Legal analysts say the Sept. 19 award by a jury in Broward County, Fla. - first reported Friday by the Daily Business Review - represents the largest such judgment over postings on an Internet blog or message board. Lyrissa Lidsky, a University of Florida law professor who specializes in free-speech issues, calls the award "astonishing."

Lidsky says the case could represent a coming trend in court fights over online messages because the woman who won the damage award, Sue Scheff of Weston, Fla., pursued the case even though she knew the defendant, Carey Bock of Mandeville, La., has no hope of paying such an award. Bock, who had to leave her home for several months because of Hurricane Katrina, couldn't afford an attorney and didn't show up for the trial.

"What's interesting about this case is that (Scheff) was so vested in being vindicated, she was willing to pay court costs," Lidsky says. "They knew before trial that the defendant couldn't pay, so what's the point in going to the jury?"

Scheff says she wanted to make a point to those who unfairly criticize others on the Internet. "I'm sure (Bock) doesn't have $1 million, let alone $11 million, but the message is strong and clear," Scheff says. "People are using the Internet to destroy people they don't like, and you can't do that."

The dispute between the two women arose after Bock asked Scheff for help in withdrawing Bock's twin sons from a boarding school in Costa Rica. Bock had disagreed with her ex-husband over how to deal with the boys' behavior problems. Against Bock's wishes, he had sent the boys to the boarding school.

Scheff, who operates a referral service called Parents Universal Resource Experts, says she referred Bock to a consultant who helped Bock retrieve her sons. Afterward, Bock became critical of Scheff and posted negative messages about her on the Internet site Fornits.com, where parents with children in boarding schools for troubled teens confer with one another.

In 2003, Scheff sued Bock for defamation. Bock hired a lawyer, but he left the case when she no longer could afford to pay him.

When Katrina hit in August 2005, Bock's house was flooded and she moved temporarily to Texas before returning to Louisiana last June. Court papers that Scheff and her attorney David H. Pollack mailed to Bock were returned to Pollack's office in Miami.

After Bock didn't offer a defense, a Broward Circuit Court judge found in favor of Scheff. A jury then heard Scheff's arguments about damages. Pollack did not seek a specific amount for the harm he says Scheff's business suffered.

"Even with no opposing counsel and no defendant there, $11 million is a huge amount," says Pollack, adding that Scheff is considering whether to try to collect any money from Bock. "The jury determined this was a significant enough issue. It's not just somebody's feelings are hurt; it's somebody's reputation is ruined."

Bock says that when she moved back to her repaired house over the summer, she knew the trial was approaching but did not know the date. She says she doesn't have the money to pay the judgment or hire a lawyer to appeal it. She adds that if the goal of Scheff's lawsuit was to stifle what Bock says online, it worked.

"I don't feel like I can express my opinions," Bock says. "Only one side of the story was told in court. Nobody heard my side."
POLiSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 10-16-2006, 03:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
zzz
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Name: Warren
Last Online: 09-11-2008 01:59 PM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 140
DNF$: 100
Location: California
Country:


Re: Jury Awards $11 Million Over Defamatory Internet Posts

In the future, would they eventually make the website operator liable for any defamatory cases if they don't pull unsupported posts down?
zzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2006, 04:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User - Must Upgrade To Post
 
Last Online: 11-14-2006 12:24 PM
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 80
DNF$: 94
Location: NearNorthPole - Canada
Country:


Re: Jury Awards $11 Million Over Defamatory Internet Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by zzz View Post
In the future, would they eventually make the website operator liable for any defamatory cases if they don't pull unsupported posts down?

I don't think website operators should be liable, because, how to differentiate unsupported posts from supported posts, at least before going to court?

When people make a claim and that is true, for example when they are saying "bad" things about someone, and, again, that is true, those people should have all right to do so. That is what I understand Freedom of Speech.

What about DNForum being liable for all negative comments we can find here about some companies, members, people...?

Just my opinion...
yesbrilliant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 02:17 AM   #4 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Name: Dave Zan
Last Online: Today 05:56 AM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,634
DNF$: 0
Location: Manila


Re: Jury Awards $11 Million Over Defamatory Internet Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by POLiSH View Post
"I don't feel like I can express my opinions," Bock says. "Only one side of the story was told in court. Nobody heard my side."
If that person went to Court and consistently presented her side, the outcome
could've been different.

The moral of that story is one should be responsible for their actions, and be ever
ready to adjust accordingly no matter what.
__________________
Dave Zan says Vidi, Vici, Veni! :-D
DaveZan.com - My Blog
Dave Zan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 02:36 AM   #5 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
flybuzz's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 12:58 AM
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 608
DNF$: 565
Location: usa


Re: Jury Awards $11 Million Over Defamatory Internet Posts

what happens exactly if you go to the court and ended up losing and can't pay? File bankruptcy or something?
flybuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Get Paid to Post, $110 for 150 Posts, Hosting, Webmaster & Internet Biz Forum marketing Domains for Sale (Domain Sales) - Fixed Prices Above $100 4 01-13-2005 03:49 PM
Movie Contest: Win up to $500 DNF on Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow! Rocket2Uranus Contests! 42 09-24-2004 09:28 PM
Movie Contest: Win up to $500 DNF on Resident Evil: Apocalypse! Rocket2Uranus Contests! 37 09-14-2004 10:25 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.
Copyright @2001-2008 DNForum.com

Learn Domains
Promote Domains
Research Domains
Buy Domains
Resell Domains
Park Domains
Sell Domains
Build Domains
Host Domains
Trademark Domains
Domain Domains
manage Domains
Appraise Domains