If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Ilze, I just read the decision on oki.ca, thanks to your fight it
means lots of great news for us domainers in regards to protecting acronyms and generics.
I noticed the decision omitted the lawyers involved, would love to know why that was.
Sorry for asking out loud but feel since it was a public decision all info can help us in the long run.
Thanks, JP
For Reported .ca Domain Sales, please visit http://excellent.ca/sold_domains.php
Forgot to put a link, here it is...
http://cira.ca/assets/Documents/Lega...167-oki.ca.pdf
After looking closer, is it just me or do I see a name association here?
Great case. They were unable to prove bad faith for the simple reason that acronyms generally cannot have an exclusive meaning.
Congratulations, Ilze! Can see that the domain name doesn't resolve to the complainant, so hopefully they'll pay up for the name soon enough.
Premium LLLL .com for sale - N::B::F::A - click here to see thread!
Women lie. Men lie. Numbers don't lie.
Email is the best way to get a hold of me - maxwell [] maxwell.me
For Reported .ca Domain Sales, please visit http://excellent.ca/sold_domains.php
Im a bit baffled here, am I seeing that the lawyer is also a CDRP panelist!
Isnt that or was that the conflict and if it wasnt caught would they have proceeded and never removed themself or did they?
Congrats on the decision! nice to see logic prevail.
Web traffic and best affiliate programs - http://www.Slaxo.com
DomainReport.ca - domain tips and .ca domain blog
@domains on Twitter - http://twitter.com/domains
Bookmarks