Good stuff - Thanks for all of your efforts.
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!This is an issue on which I've spent a bit of time over the last few months, and I thought it might be of interest here.
Laches is a legal defense that effectively questions an opposing party's good faith in bringing a case in an untimely manner. For example, Complainant A notices that Domainer B is parking a name it thinks it infringes, but decides to forego filing a complaint. Years later, after Domainer B has invested additional resources in the name, A files a UDRP. B would then argue that the delay should preclude A from winning the case.
While laches is not formally recognized under UDRP, it has had an interesting year in various UDRP opinions.
First came the Razorbacks.com decision, where a majoriy of the panel was willing to recognize the limited potential applicability of a laches defense:
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/d...2009-1139.html
Upon seeing this decision, I wrote a blog post on the issue, effectively suggesting that the laches defense is now "in play" in UDRP matters:
http://www.cyberlaw.pro/cyberlawg/do...nder-udrp.html
I was lucky enough to enjoy a good response to that post. One panelist even specifically referenced it in a subsequent decision:
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/d...2010-0228.html
(You can see the specific reference to my post in the third-to-last paragraph).
I eventually posted a "wrap up" style article where I recommend that respondents in UDRP matters consider raising a laches defense ONLY when appropriate.
http://www.cyberlaw.pro/cyberlawg/do...on-laches.html
If more proper laches defenses are raised, it may lead to greater discussion of the issue. Overall, I think that benefits domain name holders.
Eric Menhart - CyberLaw P.C.
http://www.CyberLaw.Pro and http://www.Twitter.com/EricMenhart
Note: Any comments are "general" in nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.
Good stuff - Thanks for all of your efforts.
PaleoDirectory.com - Paleo, Primal, and alternative health, fitness and diet resources.
It has long been a principle of intellectual property law that you have to diligently enforce your rights, or you may lose them.
Thanks Eric. Interesting and helpful.
Thanks for the positive comments. I'll do my best to keep an eye on the issue and update accordingly.
Eric Menhart - CyberLaw P.C.
http://www.CyberLaw.Pro and http://www.Twitter.com/EricMenhart
Note: Any comments are "general" in nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice.
Bookmarks