Welcome to Welcome to DNF.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars

If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24
  1. #1
    JuniperPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,154
    DNF$
    5,974
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    5,974
    Donate  

    A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    The name is 'law' and 'sharks' with .com at the end. I'm avoiding typing the name all togther so that it isn't listed in the search engines.

    History:

    - The name was owned by a lawyer in Colorado in the late 90's.
    - The name dropped and I bought it in mid 2002. I listed it for sale.
    - A lawyer from Los Angeles is awarded a registered service mark on the exact domain name with extension (ex. "TheName.com") July 15 2004!!!

    Serial Number 78451545
    Filing Date July 15, 2004
    Published for Opposition June 21, 2005
    Owner (APPLICANT) (his name, address)
    Type of Mark SERVICE MARK
    Register PRINCIPAL
    Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

    - The LA Lawyer in mid 2004 because making offers below asking price. I accepted, and he failed to make payment

    - The LA lawyer is now threatening to take the name (via telephone)

    So... is it legal to apply for a service mark on something you KNOW do not own, then harrass the owner for it? Should I sue this guy for devaluing MY property since I can't sell it to others without an issue? Perhaps this should be taken to the California Bar assn, since we're both in California?
    The only domain reseller BRAVE enough to post prices: TheNameStore.com ][

  2. #2
    My BB: 800-S3X-Village
    Mr. Deleted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    2,965
    DNF$
    2,021
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    2,021
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    that is called reverse hijacking, and if you get a lawyer, you'll win

    Mr. Deleted, YouTube Partner
    Joseph Slabaugh, Founder, Wally Woods, LLC

  3. #3
    Platinum Lifetime Member
    DNjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,033
    DNF$
    196
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    196
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    I , without a doubt, would take this to the cal. bar assoc. , I don't see how this dirtbag could get a service mark on a domain he does not own , maybe a few lies in the paperwork? oh , that would be nice wouldn't it.
    Last edited by Searchsix.com; 08-31-2005 at 04:48 PM. Reason: oops

  4. #4
    DNF Regular
    NameYourself's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    World
    Posts
    868
    DNF$
    5,357
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    5,357
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    Contact JBerryHill here in the forums. He is an expert in this area.

  5. #5
    Bloody Hell
    Acro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,666
    Country

    Holy See
    DNF$
    15,567
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,567
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    "An opposition is now pending at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board."

    Did you appeal the mark or someone else did?

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog

  6. #6
    JuniperPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,154
    DNF$
    5,974
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    5,974
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    Quote Originally Posted by RADiSTAR
    "An opposition is now pending at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board."

    Did you appeal the mark or someone else did?
    That's interesting -- I see that somone HAS filed against it, and it wasn't me! I also found that his application is online, and includes this:

    Declaration

    The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001, and that such willful false statements, and the like, may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b), he/she believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; and that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

    Signature: /123-4567/ Date: 07/15/2004
    Signatory's Name: Victor Valleau

    ==========

    This could get interesting. I can't imagine a clearer case if violation.
    The only domain reseller BRAVE enough to post prices: TheNameStore.com ][

  7. #7
    Bloody Hell
    Acro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,666
    Country

    Holy See
    DNF$
    15,567
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,567
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    Hammer away - I would contact the office immediately if I were you.

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog

  8. #8
    JuniperPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,154
    DNF$
    5,974
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    5,974
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    I didn't realize that I could access all of this information was available on the www.USPTO.gov site!

    Apparently a 4th party (not me, not the owner from the 1990's) is fighting for this trademark. It's a legal publishing company from Canada.

    http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?p...&pty=OPP&eno=2

    There is going to be "testimony taken" between Sept 8 2005 and March 7 2006, with the whole process wrapping up Sept 2006! Click the links on the right and you're taken to a 5 page legal document where the Candian firm argues their case... THEY'VE BEEN USING THE MARK SINCE 2003, and received a Canadian trademark in 2004!

    Remember, I've owned the name since 2002, and the mark is for my precise name with the ".com" in the mark.

    I tried to file an opposition online, but I get an error that the deadline has passed. I tried to file a cancellation, but it says the serial number (78451545) is invalid (it's not!). Not sure what to do.

    Apparently neither company bothered to look up the ownership before filing tons of legal documents?
    Last edited by JuniperPark; 09-01-2005 at 12:18 PM.
    The only domain reseller BRAVE enough to post prices: TheNameStore.com ][

  9. #9
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Manila
    Posts
    1,721
    DNF$
    7,963
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    7,963
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    You could also use the mess.com UDRP as an example.

    But that tidbit you found in USPTO is an even better bet.
    Vidi, Vici, Veni!

  10. #10
    Philadelphia Lawyer
    jberryhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,020
    DNF$
    6,642
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    6,642
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    So... is it legal to apply for a service mark on something you KNOW do not own, then harrass the owner for it?
    The question is not necessarily that simple. However, the short answer would appear to be a violation of the federal perjury statute has ocurred.

    (that is the import of 18 USC 1001 referenced in the standard declaration)
    John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
    John-AT-johnberryhill.com
    Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.

  11. #11
    Bloody Hell
    Acro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,666
    Country

    Holy See
    DNF$
    15,567
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,567
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    It appears that the domain was owned before, between 2000 and 2002.

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog

  12. #12
    Gold Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boca Raton, FL
    Posts
    590
    DNF$
    1,765
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    1,765
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    My own article on this reverse-hijacking method is here:
    http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl...35&mode=thread

  13. #13
    Platinum Lifetime Member
    greggish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,107
    DNF$
    965
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    965
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    Quote Originally Posted by dtobias
    My own article on this reverse-hijacking method is here:
    http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl...35&mode=thread
    I read your article Dan. Great stuff, but it had me so angry at the incompetence of these judges.
    WAL*BORG - Resistance is futile. You WILL shop here.

  14. #14
    Bloody Hell
    Acro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,666
    Country

    Holy See
    DNF$
    15,567
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,567
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    Quote Originally Posted by dtobias
    My own article on this reverse-hijacking method is here:
    http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl...35&mode=thread
    Where is a link to the paint.biz decision? It doesn't come at at http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/search/

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog

  15. #15
    My BB: 800-S3X-Village
    Mr. Deleted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    2,965
    DNF$
    2,021
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    2,021
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/112596.htm
    If you click on the link in the article that should come up

    Mr. Deleted, YouTube Partner
    Joseph Slabaugh, Founder, Wally Woods, LLC

  16. #16
    Bloody Hell
    Acro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,666
    Country

    Holy See
    DNF$
    15,567
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,567
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    Thanks Joe.
    But that was done using the NAF, not the WIPO.
    To be honest, I am not aware of the NAF's role and legtimacy over WIPO. Why would one file a case with NAF over the WIPO?

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog

  17. #17
    Gold Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boca Raton, FL
    Posts
    590
    DNF$
    1,765
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    1,765
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    NAF and WIPO are both ICANN-accredited dispute resolution providers under UDRP. There were some others, but I'm not sure any of them are still operating.

  18. #18
    Gold Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Kuwait
    Posts
    35
    DNF$
    703
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    703
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    Perhaps someone like Dan or JB could correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the purpose of using NAF over WIPO for UDRP was that statistically their 'experts' were more likely to side with the 'mark' holder in cases of dubious legitimacy?

    Or am I reading too much into the results of a small sample of really bad cases?

  19. #19
    Bloody Hell
    Acro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    28,666
    Country

    Holy See
    DNF$
    15,567
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    15,567
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    WIPO is the global organization whereas NAF is US-based. As for the statistics you mentioned, you are probably correct.

    DomainGang.com - Digital Entertainment for Domainers
    Acroplex - Web & Graphics
    Acro.net - My Blog

  20. #20
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Manila
    Posts
    1,721
    DNF$
    7,963
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    7,963
    Donate  

    Re: A Lawyer gets SM on my .com AS a .COM!!

    If you think about it, NAF seems a more practical choice if both complainant
    and respondent are US-based. Seems, anyway.
    Vidi, Vici, Veni!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com