Welcome to Welcome to DNF.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars

If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    dvdrip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Athens Greece
    Posts
    2,713
    DNF$
    14,482
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    14,482
    Donate  

    myknot.com 2 wipos in 6 months!

    myknot.com has a second WIPO in 6 months. The owner is the same.
    D2008-0033 myknot.com 14-Jan-2008 Pending

    This is from last year:
    http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/d...2007-1006.html

    UDRP has become a joke. Something has to be done about this. Soon...

    Crap decision:
    http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/d...2006-0340.html
    Last edited by dvdrip; 02-27-2008 at 08:05 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
    www.bluepixel.gr I like .info!
    Now accepting .gr domain registrations from any foreign company or individual. Contact me for details.

  2. #2
    Devil Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,203
    DNF$
    12,930
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    12,930
    Donate  
    Dissenting Panelist
    Nasser Khasawneh


    Wow, first time I've ever seen that....

  3. #3
    Buying CC.com
    Credit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,689
    DNF$
    1,856
    Bank
    111,644
    Total DNF$
    113,499
    Donate  
    myknot.com took away knot.com?

    Am I getting something wrong here...holy crap..

  4. #4
    Devil Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,203
    DNF$
    12,930
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    12,930
    Donate  
    Quote Originally Posted by RichInCollege View Post
    myknot.com took away knot.com?

    Am I getting something wrong here...holy crap..
    No, The Knot, Inc. wipo'ed myknot.com but lost, but in 06 The Knot, Inc. wipo'ed knot.com and won.... BS

  5. #5
    Buying CC.com
    Credit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,689
    DNF$
    1,856
    Bank
    111,644
    Total DNF$
    113,499
    Donate  
    that's what I meant..about the 06...that's definitely BS. I bet the owners were pretty pissed. knot.com is a very serious name.

  6. #6
    DNF Newbie
    dburk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    27
    DNF$
    3,491
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    3,491
    Donate  
    Does this mean that any dictionary word can be taken away just by trademarking it with a "The" in font of it?

    What ever happened to the principle of predated use and common use language?

    It seems this panel picked only the parts they wanted and ignored key principles of trademark law, this sets a really bad precedent in my opinion.

  7. #7
    Platinum Lifetime Member
    Fatbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    489
    DNF$
    895
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    895
    Donate  
    I would have completely flipped out if that was my domain.

    It was registered before theknot.com existed, it's a generic word, it's so many things. I sure hope they continue to fight this.

  8. #8
    dvdrip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Athens Greece
    Posts
    2,713
    DNF$
    14,482
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    14,482
    Donate  
    I would really like to know if the Complainant for the second WIPO for myknot.com is the same as the first one.
    www.bluepixel.gr I like .info!
    Now accepting .gr domain registrations from any foreign company or individual. Contact me for details.

  9. #9
    Devil Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,203
    DNF$
    12,930
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    12,930
    Donate  
    Quote Originally Posted by dvdrip View Post
    I would really like to know if the Complainant for the second WIPO for myknot.com is the same as the first one.
    Looks like it to me.

  10. #10
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    256
    DNF$
    939
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    939
    Donate  
    that knot vs theknot decision is the worst I've seen yet (even though it was a couple of years ago).

    couple of things really stand out:

    1. panel ruled that, in this case, it strains credulity to believe that Respondent acquired this domain name for $5,000 because of its attraction as a dictionary word. If that were the case, one would expect to see links and advertisements related to the kinds of knots made from rope and string, which is the primary meaning of the word “knot” in the dictionary reference Respondent submitted with its Response. So they penalized him because weddings wasn't the first dictionary reference, although they acknowledge it was there. wow. that really makes good sense. And not believing a dictionary dot com can be worth 5,000? boy, they sure know their internet stuff. And they expect to ads for rope and string for a wedding related dictionary term? that's a keeper! What are the qualification requirements for these panel guys? What interweb reality did they come from?

    2. Another reason that the Panel doubts the veracity of Respondent’s claims is that its assertions – particularly, its claims regarding its motivation for acquiring the disputed domain name, and its lack of knowledge of Complainant and its mark at that time – were contained only in the Response submitted and signed on Respondent’s behalf by its counsel, and not in any sworn affidavit signed by an individual with personal knowledge. Uh, you have to be kidding me. This one goes beyond the pale. He was penalized because his lawyer represented him?!

    3. Piece de resistance, they inferred he must have had prior knowledge of the company trademark because both parties’ sites are in the same language (English). I laughed out loud at that one. Time to develop in Swahili I guess.

    How was this not appealed in court? I notice theknot has the name, so it must not have happened.

    This is the worst one of seen (I've looked at lots, don't know how I missed this one). I wonder we are going to end up, 'cause there's a lot of chilly stuff out there for domainers right now.

  11. #11
    DNF Addict
    DNQuest.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Columbia, MD
    Posts
    1,092
    DNF$
    7,502
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    7,502
    Donate  
    Quote Originally Posted by dburk View Post

    It seems this panel picked only the parts they wanted and ignored key principles of trademark law, this sets a really bad precedent in my opinion.
    I have first hand knowledge of this. Panelist can and do choose what they want to see, perhaps to get a finding which they may have prejudged already.
    Track emails that you send, PM me to find out how....

  12. #12
    Platinum Lifetime Member
    Fatbat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    489
    DNF$
    895
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    895
    Donate  
    Quote Originally Posted by spidergoat View Post
    How was this not appealed in court? I notice theknot has the name, so it must not have happened.
    Yeah, I originally missed the fact that this happened 2 years ago. Maybe they blew their budget buying the domain and didn't have any money left for a court case. Seems odd that they wouldn't fight for it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com