

| | #1 (permalink) |
| TheBest.com Name: George Kirikos Last Online: Today 02:56 PM iTrader: (2) Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,206
DNF$: 866 Location: Toronto, Canada
Country: | potsdam.com Another ridiculous decision by WIPO, but what do you expect when the Respondent defaults?? http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/deci...2002-0856.html The panelists must just cut/paste from past decisions, when they get cases like this. |
| | |
| Sponsored Ads |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Gold Lifetime Member | This decision goes against the recent trend denying relief to cities through the UDRP and STOP. For a complete list, see http://www.udrplaw.net/CityNamesResources.htm. Back in July, Munich lost two STOP cases: muenchen.biz and munich.biz. The big difference between the Munich cases and the Potsdam case is that the registrant showed up in the Munich cases and the panelists were aware of the trend in cases against cities. What makes Potsdam any different than Heidelberg (http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/deci...2001-1500.html)? |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |