It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

DNforum.com - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals
 
Register Now!
Register Now for FREE!
Our records show you have not yet registered to our forums. To sign up for your FREE account INSTANTLY fill out the form below!

Username: Password: Confirm Password: E-Mail: Confirm E-Mail:  
Birthday:       I agree to forum rules 

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Domain News, Beginners Guides and Legal Stuff! > Legal Issues
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Click Here
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2004, 08:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
.biz's Avatar
 
Last Online: 12-06-2008 08:55 PM
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,055
DNF$: 10
Location: U.S.


qnx.info

elequa lose the 3-letter domain name!!

http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/deci...2003-0921.html
__________________
myboards.com
.biz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-04-2004, 04:34 AM   #2 (permalink)
Gold Lifetime Member
 
Last Online: 10-04-2008 02:07 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 327
DNF$: 1,269
Location: UK
Country:


Re: qnx.info

.QNX is used by Intuit (Quicken Indexes file extension).

It is overreach for a trademark to prevent others from using these initials lawfully.

Unlike Verisign (which tries to take every non registered domains in .com - with Sitefinder), the legal owner paid for this domain to do with as he will.

He could have LEGALLY started his own company with it or LEGALLY sold it to another person for this purpose.

Anybody can use these letters for lawful purpose - which includes directing people to your site if it is not doing anything illegal - like selling counterfeit QNX Software.

To me it is clearly trademark overreach by QNX Software Systems - as usual aided and abetted by WIPO panelist Judges.

It is my informed opinion that panelist's Alan L. Limbury and Jacques A. Léger are corrupt and that David E. Sorkin, whom dissented, was the only honest one amongst them.

Last edited by Garry Anderson; 03-04-2004 at 04:39 AM..
Garry Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.
Copyright @2001-2008 DNForum.com

Learn Domains
Promote Domains
Research Domains
Buy Domains
Resell Domains
Park Domains
Sell Domains
Build Domains
Host Domains
Trademark Domains
Domain Domains
manage Domains
Appraise Domains