Welcome to Welcome to DNF.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars

If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Gold Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    170
    DNF$
    315
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    315
    Donate  

    Show up to defend your sucks names

    Earlier this week, NAF Panelist Sandra Franklin issued two decisions involving sucks names. In both cases, the registrants had been former employees of the Complainants' companies. And in each case, the registrants failed to show up and defend their names.

    Naturally, Panelist Franklin ordered transfer to the Complainants. You guys can read the decisions here: http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/133637.htm and http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/134653.htm.

    Compare this with WIPO's Nov. decision in the ASDAsucks.net case: http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/deci...2002-0857.html . Same facts, registrant failed to file a response. But in the WIPO case, Panelist Tony Willoughby said "the Panel is unable to accept that 'a substantial number of people are likely to be confused about the potential association of the Domain Name with the Complainant ..' The Panel believes that by now the number of Internet users who do not appreciate the significance of the ‘-sucks’ suffix must be so small as to be de minimis and not worthy of consideration. The Panel notes that the Complainant puts forward no evidence to substantiate that contention. The Panel believes that Internet users will be well aware that a domain name with a ‘-sucks’ suffix does not have the approval of the relevant trade mark owner."

    Come on. If you own a sucks domain and you get a UDRP, show up and defend it. There are plenty of writers on this board who can help. I agree with Willoughby's statement on this- by now, enough Internet users should know that "sucks" isn't likely to confuse Internet users that the site is authorized and official.

  2. #2
    Gold Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boca Raton, FL
    Posts
    590
    DNF$
    1,765
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    1,765
    Donate  
    Yes, I saw those decisions, and don't like the way the panelist brushed off the concept that "sucks" names are not confusingly similar because of their derogatory nature. On the other hand, since they were both defaults, the respondent kind of deserved what he got, for not even trying to defend himself.

    Personally, if I were setting up a noncommercial protest site, I'd use .org or .info instead of .com, anyway...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com