Glad to hear it - hope you're making a mint with the name!
DN owners need to realize that they have to pay the registration fee just like homeowners need to pay their taxes.
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Good!Originally Posted by RMF
In general, when someone claims trademark infringement, and threatens a domain-holder with immediate legal action, but does nothing for many months, has he implicitly abandoned his rights to the name?
Glad to hear it - hope you're making a mint with the name!
DN owners need to realize that they have to pay the registration fee just like homeowners need to pay their taxes.
Originally Posted by Nameable
Ah, I miss the days when domains were free.
Glad it seems to have been worked out.
Is there a way to actually verify previous registration holders of a domain name? Maybe he was blowing smoke? If he tried to get the name from the previous holder of "his name" that guy let it expire, he missed it and moved on to harrassing you?
"In general, when someone claims trademark infringement, and threatens a domain-holder with immediate legal action, but does nothing for many months, has he implicitly abandoned his rights to the name?"
The odds of success of a laches defense increases in proportion to "many". In general, "months" is a non-starter. After a couple of years, then you have something.
John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
John-AT-johnberryhill.com
Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.
Two years, miniumn, then? That's good to know.Originally Posted by jberryhill
I'm certain many people who hold generic names have been threatened by would-be trademark holders.
"Two years, miniumn, then? That's good to know."
I wouldn't quote that as a hard-and-fast rule. Your mileage may vary, but there are TM cases in which a laches defense prevailed in view of periods of inaction as short as that.
"I'm certain many people who hold generic names have been threatened by would-be trademark holders."
Absolutely. People will say almost anything to get their hands on a good domain name sometimes. But that is no different from ownership of any other sort of valuable asset. When one has something that other people want, then inevitably one must defend against claims of right advanced by others.
Rights of ownership in anything are not self-executing. I once had a neighbor, for example, who genuinely believed he owned a five-foot wide strip of property near the edge of my backyard. Was it an unwelcome pain to hire a surveyor to come out and mark out the legal boundaries of my yard? You bet. Was it even more of a pain to find out my neighbor came out in the middle of the night to move the surveyor's stakes? Yep. But life is like that, and domain name disputes haven't added anything new to the burden of one who must protect his or her rights from time to time. Anyone who has anything valuable, and anyone in any line of business, has to deal rationally with conflict.
John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
John-AT-johnberryhill.com
Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.
He was the old registrant. I know that for a fact.Originally Posted by Nodnarb
RMF
Bookmarks