If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!
Read on and have a laugh.
http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/671304.htm
Vidi, Vici, Veni!
That's hilariousOriginally Posted by Dave Zan
Thanks for the link
- Rob
The cat lost because it didn't defend it.
-=DCG=-
At least the panalist tried his best to induce logic into his findings to rule bad faith.
On a side note, there was a cat which inhereted millions of dollars when its owner died. The cat was the sole hier. So could that cat in fact register a domain name since it had legal status?? lol
Track emails that you send, PM me to find out how....
The cat was neutered so it didn't have any B@lls to stand up and fight.
Funny article.
"The disputed domain name is used by one Mr. Woods to teach a class to demonstrate how companies (such a Complainant) do not register obvious domain names."
The domain name is not obvious. It is long and low quality.
rules of DNforum
google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
searchmarketing.yahoo.com/srchsb/sse_gl.php
"If Respondent is in fact a cat from outer space, then it should have so indicated in its reply, in order to avoid unnecessary perplexity by the Panel. Further, it should have explained why a cat from outer space would allow Mr. Woods to use the disputed domain name. In the absence of such an explanation, the Panel must conclude that, if Respondent is a cat from outer space, then it may have something to hide, and this is indicative of bad faith behavior."
Ha.
Posting Permissions
View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
View Friends
View Blog Entries
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks