View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
View Friends
View Blog Entries
Reply With QuoteI think your statement is emotionally charged under the circumstances. Unless supported with statistical data proving otherwise.Originally Posted by DomainsInc
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!
Obviously the due process just doesn't work. UDRP is bias to the complainant.
I think your statement is emotionally charged under the circumstances. Unless supported with statistical data proving otherwise.
They used an intellectual proerty attorney but they did not use one that specializes in UDRP disputes. It looks like they screwed it up as the respondent's supplemental response was not accepted.
Network-Tools.com - Network Tools since 1998
The real question is why LH.com was with Moniker instead of Elequa's own i.net
Oversight? Testing?
If Elequa indeed filed suit, he'd better follow through if he really wants to get
that domain name back.
Vidi, Vici, Veni!
It is mentioned in the UDRP that suit had been filed in US Federal Court even before the UDRP decision.
Elequa has one of the (if not the) largest collections of short domains. If he does not want companies lining up to take them away from him he had better stomp on this hard.
This could be the defining battle, folks.
Domain names for sale, most are one word: http://bndn.com
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks