Closing Doman Auctions
DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
HomeRegisterMembershipsGetting StartedDomain Tools Domain EbooksSEO Software Domain Resellers Advertise

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Domain News, Beginners Guides and Legal Stuff! > Domain Name Legal Issues
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2003, 04:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
No Avatar
 
Last Online: 04-18-2008 03:27 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 203
DNF$: 372
Location: Florida


Where to find unregisterable marks

I own a two-letter domain name which is a common English language phrase. I'd like to know if the USPTO has ever denied a trademark for the phrase.

In the "waterfrontliving.com" case at:
http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/102179.htm
the panel says:
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reports that "no final determination as to the registerability of the mark has been made."

Where can I find if the USPTO has found a mark to be unregisterable?

I've had no luck at www.uspto.gov
Ovicide is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads
Old 01-20-2003, 04:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
No Avatar
 
Last Online: 04-18-2008 03:27 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 203
DNF$: 372
Location: Florida


Re: Where to find unregisterable marks

Quote:
Originally posted by Ovicide
I own a two-letter ...
Sorry, I should have said "two-word" domain name.
Ovicide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2003, 05:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User - Must Upgrade To Post
 
DomainPairs's Avatar
 
Last Online: 03-12-2007 06:01 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,392
DNF$: 582
Location: England


I seem to remember that there was some issue that Intel got involved in. Something to do with American rivers not being part of trademarks. There may be other word restrictions as well.

Maybe an American lawyer can comment.
DomainPairs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2003, 11:27 PM   #4 (permalink)
Philadelphia Lawyer
 
jberryhill's Avatar
 
Last Online: 09-18-2009 01:17 AM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,987
DNF$: 6,350

Send a message via ICQ to jberryhill

If an application for registration was filed, and eventually refused by the USPTO, you will find that information in the USPTO database.

Of course, if no application was filed, you will not find that information in the USPTO database (or, rather, you will find, by its absence, that no application was filed).

Whether a term is "unregistrable" for a particular class of goods and services doesn't mean it is unregistrable for another class of goods and services. For example, "dogfood" is unregistrable for dogfood, but would make a dandy mark for, say, jewelry.

Also, if you see an initial refusal and an eventual abandonment, that doesn't necessarily mean the term was not registrable. Maybe the applicant didn't feel responding, or had changed plans to use another mark.

However, when you see a rejection of a term such as "Waterfront Living" for goods or services relating to waterfront living, then it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out what happened.
__________________
John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
John-AT-johnberryhill.com
Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.
jberryhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2003, 08:13 AM   #5 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
No Avatar
 
Last Online: 04-18-2008 03:27 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 203
DNF$: 372
Location: Florida


Quote:
Originally posted by jberryhill
Whether a term is "unregistrable" for a particular class of goods and services doesn't mean it is unregistrable for another class of goods and services. For example, "dogfood" is unregistrable for dogfood, but would make a dandy mark for, say, jewelry.
Thank you for this clear answer.

I've had the name two years. It's a substring of a trademark owned by a large local company. I'm using the name (in a lexically appropriate way, unrelated to the company's business) and they haven't approached me about it -- but I don't want a lawsuit. Almost all the traffic on the name does appear to be for their company.

A year and a half ago, I made an appointment with a big law firm (cost $450 for an hour), to try to find out whether I'm on solid ground owning the name. I tried to explain the situation to them (and brought screen captures, etc), but they didn't really understand domain name issues and didn't have a computer available which would have helped me explain.
Ovicide is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM.
Copyright @2001-2009 DNForum.com