Welcome to Welcome to DNF.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars

If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    203
    DNF$
    548
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    548
    Donate  

    Where to find unregisterable marks

    I own a two-letter domain name which is a common English language phrase. I'd like to know if the USPTO has ever denied a trademark for the phrase.

    In the "waterfrontliving.com" case at:
    http://www.arbforum.com/domains/decisions/102179.htm
    the panel says:
    The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reports that "no final determination as to the registerability of the mark has been made."

    Where can I find if the USPTO has found a mark to be unregisterable?

    I've had no luck at www.uspto.gov

  2. #2
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    203
    DNF$
    548
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    548
    Donate  

    Re: Where to find unregisterable marks

    Originally posted by Ovicide
    I own a two-letter ...
    Sorry, I should have said "two-word" domain name.

  3. #3
    Registered User - Must Upgrade To Post DomainPairs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,392
    DNF$
    632
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    632
    Donate  
    I seem to remember that there was some issue that Intel got involved in. Something to do with American rivers not being part of trademarks. There may be other word restrictions as well.

    Maybe an American lawyer can comment.

  4. #4
    Philadelphia Lawyer
    jberryhill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    3,020
    DNF$
    6,574
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    6,574
    Donate  
    If an application for registration was filed, and eventually refused by the USPTO, you will find that information in the USPTO database.

    Of course, if no application was filed, you will not find that information in the USPTO database (or, rather, you will find, by its absence, that no application was filed).

    Whether a term is "unregistrable" for a particular class of goods and services doesn't mean it is unregistrable for another class of goods and services. For example, "dogfood" is unregistrable for dogfood, but would make a dandy mark for, say, jewelry.

    Also, if you see an initial refusal and an eventual abandonment, that doesn't necessarily mean the term was not registrable. Maybe the applicant didn't feel responding, or had changed plans to use another mark.

    However, when you see a rejection of a term such as "Waterfront Living" for goods or services relating to waterfront living, then it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out what happened.
    John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
    John-AT-johnberryhill.com
    Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.

  5. #5
    Platinum Lifetime Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    203
    DNF$
    548
    Bank
    0
    Total DNF$
    548
    Donate  
    Originally posted by jberryhill
    Whether a term is "unregistrable" for a particular class of goods and services doesn't mean it is unregistrable for another class of goods and services. For example, "dogfood" is unregistrable for dogfood, but would make a dandy mark for, say, jewelry.
    Thank you for this clear answer.

    I've had the name two years. It's a substring of a trademark owned by a large local company. I'm using the name (in a lexically appropriate way, unrelated to the company's business) and they haven't approached me about it -- but I don't want a lawsuit. Almost all the traffic on the name does appear to be for their company.

    A year and a half ago, I made an appointment with a big law firm (cost $450 for an hour), to try to find out whether I'm on solid ground owning the name. I tried to explain the situation to them (and brought screen captures, etc), but they didn't really understand domain name issues and didn't have a computer available which would have helped me explain.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Domain name forum recommended by Domaining.com