DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
HomeRegisterMembershipsGetting StartedDomain Tools Domain EbooksSEO Software Domain Resellers Advertise

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Domain News, Beginners Guides and Legal Stuff! > Domain Name Legal Issues
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-16-2009, 03:15 AM   #1 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
domaingenius's Avatar
 
Last Online: 11-07-2009 12:10 PM
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,027
DNF$: 148
Location: United Kingdom
Country:


WIPO visit website

Pray tell me, why would WIPO visit the website of a domain the day that
a UDRP is filed ? Do they check the site or whats on the domain and
then tell the Panelists ? Surely they are, and dont laugh please ,they
are meant to be neutral (I would neuter them all myself) ?;
inetnum: 193.5.88.0 - 193.5.95.255
netname: WIPONET
descr: World Intellectual Property Organization
descr: UN Specialized Agency
descr: Geneva
country: CH
admin-c: AM4504-RIPE
tech-c: AM4504-RIPE
status: ASSIGNED PI "status:" definitions
mnt-by: CH-UNISOURCE-MNT
mnt-by: DE-COLT-MNT
source: RIPE # Filtered

DG
domaingenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads
Old 01-16-2009, 06:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
No Avatar
 
Last Online: 03-10-2009 11:58 PM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 259
DNF$: 0
Location: michigan

Send a message via ICQ to harleyx Send a message via AIM to harleyx Send a message via MSN to harleyx

My first guess would be it's a robot that scrapes the site as soon as a dispute is filed, so they can get the most accurate picture of what the website contains when the complaint is filed.

No doubt most people change their website once they become aware they're being WIPO'ed, so that just seems logical to me.
__________________
If it sounds too good to be true, post it on DNForum and you'll find some suckers!
harleyx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 07:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
TheLegendaryJP's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 01:07 AM
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,165
DNF$: 6,332
Country:




Quote:
Originally Posted by domaingenius View Post
(I would neuter them all myself) ?;


DG


TheLegendaryJP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 08:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
domaingenius's Avatar
 
Last Online: 11-07-2009 12:10 PM
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,027
DNF$: 148
Location: United Kingdom
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by harleyx View Post
My first guess would be it's a robot that scrapes the site as soon as a dispute is filed, so they can get the most accurate picture of what the website contains when the complaint is filed.

No doubt most people change their website once they become aware they're being WIPO'ed, so that just seems logical to me.
You may well be right, and I am not concerned about the site because it
is a legitimate website selling products and I applied for TM for it.
However it surely throws into doubt the contention by WIPO that they
are neutral ?. Sure if the Panelist its fine but for WIPO to do it shows
a degree of bias , which I have always thought existed because their job
is to promote IP rights enforcement and that does not sit neatly
with running the UDRP.


I would appreciate a Lawyers input as to what possibilities
exist to get WIPO into Court to answer such matters in
regard to a specific case ?. WIPO are in Swissland ,so where
and what would I litigate ?

DG
domaingenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 09:23 AM   #5 (permalink)
Missing in action
 
sdsinc's Avatar
 
Name: Kate
Last Online: Yesterday 05:01 PM
iTrader: (41)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,671
DNF$: 28,105
Location: .cz
Country:


It is pretty normal that the panelists want to check the actual usage for the domain.
sdsinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 09:48 AM   #6 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
domaingenius's Avatar
 
Last Online: 11-07-2009 12:10 PM
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,027
DNF$: 148
Location: United Kingdom
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by sdsinc View Post
It is pretty normal that the panelists want to check the actual usage for the domain.
I dont dispute the Panelist, but the role of WIPO is supposed to
be an overseer of the process, but interfering in the decision
process.

DG
domaingenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 09:58 AM   #7 (permalink)
TheBest.com
 
GeorgeK's Avatar
 
Name: George Kirikos
Last Online: Yesterday 11:02 PM
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,206
DNF$: 866
Location: Toronto, Canada
Country:


http://www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp-rules-24oct99.htm

Quote:
2. Communications

(a) When forwarding a complaint to the Respondent, it shall be the Provider's responsibility to employ reasonably available means calculated to achieve actual notice to Respondent. Achieving actual notice, or employing the following measures to do so, shall discharge this responsibility:

(i) sending the complaint to all postal-mail and facsimile addresses (A) shown in the domain name's registration data in Registrar's Whois database for the registered domain-name holder, the technical contact, and the administrative contact and (B) supplied by Registrar to the Provider for the registration's billing contact; and

(ii) sending the complaint in electronic form (including annexes to the extent available in that form) by e-mail to:

(A) the e-mail addresses for those technical, administrative, and billing contacts;

(B) postmaster@<the contested domain name>; and

(C) if the domain name (or "www." followed by the domain name) resolves to an active web page (other than a generic page the Provider concludes is maintained by a registrar or ISP for parking domain-names registered by multiple domain-name holders), any e-mail address shown or e-mail links on that web page; and
No need to be paranoid in this case. They're just checking for email addresses to send the complaint to that might be listed on the website.
__________________
George Kirikos
Home Page
GeorgeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 10:38 AM   #8 (permalink)
Bloody lovely
 
Acro's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 02:57 AM
iTrader: (394)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,904
DNF$: 4,079
Location: USA
Country:




Use a forwarding rule that checks the visiting IP and if it belongs to the WIPO organization, forward them to Scientology.com
__________________

DomainGang.com - Domainers' Most Awesome News Source
Acroplex - Web & Graphics
Acro.net - My Blog
My Countdown Counting down to: Snapnames rebate hitting my mailbox
78 days 17 hours 58 minutes
Acro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 11:53 AM   #9 (permalink)
Missing in action
 
sdsinc's Avatar
 
Name: Kate
Last Online: Yesterday 05:01 PM
iTrader: (41)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,671
DNF$: 28,105
Location: .cz
Country:


Great idea

Something along these lines (untested):
Code:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^193\.5\.([8][8-9])|([9][0-5])\.
RewriteRule ^.*$ http://www.scientology.org/ [R=301,L]
Or just block by CIDR:
Code:
order deny,allow
deny from 193.5.88.0/21
allow from all
sdsinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.
Copyright @2001-2009 DNForum.com