Valuate Domain Names
DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
HomeRegisterMembershipsGetting StartedDomain Tools Domain EbooksSEO Software Domain Resellers Advertise

Go Back   DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars > Gold Forums > IDN General Discussion
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-25-2008, 06:32 PM   #661 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Rubber Duck's Avatar
 
Last Online: 11-07-2009 06:47 PM
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,817
DNF$: 2,935


Quote:
Originally Posted by DomainsInc View Post
If idn.idn comes out i think it will end up rendering idn.com,net,org ect obsolete.
And whilst we are on. What is the IF about? ICANN has already stated this will happen. There is still a little uncertainty over the when, but it will be in the next 12 months. The How is going to be decided in Paris. There is also a little uncertainty over the what, but nobody in their right mind is going to suggest that China will not be given the Alias for CN that they have been using for the last couple of years.

Also you need to understand that Representations and Registrations are likely to be very different animals. There are a few things to sort out but dot Com will have local representations that resolve to the same IP. So there is not a cat in hells chance of the IDN with ASCII ccTLD going anywhere. To suggest that this would be the case just manifests ignorance of the subject.

This whole thread was a gratuitous attack on IDN right from the out. Totally without justification and without any kind of substantiation that makes sense to anyone that knows anything about the subject. Furthermore, most of this is a total affront to the cultures of other countries. Countries that if the US will need to form very firm trade relations, if it is going to retain any semblance of being and economic power.
__________________
Yours, Rubber Duck

Please note that any historic offers over a month old are null and void.

Last edited by Rubber Duck; 04-25-2008 at 06:36 PM..
Rubber Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads
Old 04-25-2008, 07:07 PM   #662 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
No Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 11:38 PM
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,400
DNF$: 437
Location: Ottawa
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubber Duck View Post
Thinking normally involves some in depth reasoning. Would you care to share you analysis. Or is this just a development of Descartes philosophy: "I think therefore it is so."

Unfortunately the word think is much abused and now has many meanings:

v.tr.
To have or formulate in the mind.
To reason about or reflect on; ponder: Think how complex language is. Think the matter through.
To decide by reasoning, reflection, or pondering: thinking what to do.
To judge or regard; look upon: I think it only fair.
To believe; suppose: always thought he was right.

To expect; hope: They thought she'd arrive early.
To intend: They thought they'd take their time.
To call to mind; remember: I can't think what her name was.
To visualize; imagine: Think what a scene it will be at the reunion.
To devise or evolve; invent: thought up a plan to get rich quick.
To bring into a given condition by mental preoccupation: He thought himself into a panic over the impending examination.
To concentrate one's thoughts on: “Think languor” (Diana Vreeland).

v.intr.
To exercise the power of reason, as by conceiving ideas, drawing inferences, and using judgment.
To weigh or consider an idea: They are thinking about moving.
To bring a thought to mind by imagination or invention: No one before had thought of bifocal glasses.
To recall a thought or an image to mind: She thought of her childhood when she saw the movie.
To believe; suppose: He thinks of himself as a wit. It's later than you think.
To have care or consideration: Think first of the ones you love.
To dispose the mind in a given way: Do you think so?

The one I go for is in Red.
The reasoning should be obvious. Would you rather type in characters and an alphabetical extention or all characters?
DomainsInc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 07:13 PM   #663 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Rubber Duck's Avatar
 
Last Online: 11-07-2009 06:47 PM
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,817
DNF$: 2,935


Quote:
Originally Posted by DomainsInc View Post
The reasoning should be obvious. Would you rather type in characters and an alphabetical extention or all characters?
The only thing that is obvious is that you have totally missed the point. You will be able to navigate to dot Coms typing all characters if you wish, but most of the Chinese that I have talked to seem to think that the extension will tend to get typed in the highly recognised global brand of dot Com. Either way it doesn't matter. As an argument for the demise of IDN.com this is just a non-starter, obvious or not.
__________________
Yours, Rubber Duck

Please note that any historic offers over a month old are null and void.
Rubber Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 07:18 PM   #664 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
No Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 11:38 PM
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,400
DNF$: 437
Location: Ottawa
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubber Duck View Post
The only thing that is obvious is that you have totally missed the point. You will be able to navigate to dot Coms typing all characters if you wish, but most of the Chinese that I have talked to seem to think that the extension will tend to get typed in the highly recognised global brand of dot Com. Either way it doesn't matter. As an argument for the demise of IDN.com this is just a non-starter, obvious or not.
I don't know much about IDN's. I could be totally wrong but wouldn't it just be easier to type in the character equivalent of .com rather than switching settings on the keyboard to type .com? If you can just type .com as easily as you would characters then yeah, .com is globally recognized and is the number one exention out there.
DomainsInc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 07:26 PM   #665 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
Rubber Duck's Avatar
 
Last Online: 11-07-2009 06:47 PM
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,817
DNF$: 2,935


Quote:
Originally Posted by DomainsInc View Post
I don't know much about IDN's. I could be totally wrong but wouldn't it just be easier to type in the character equivalent of .com rather than switching settings on the keyboard to type .com? If you can just type .com as easily as you would characters then yeah, .com is globally recognized and is the number one exention out there.
In Russian Cyrillic probably yes, but as Chinese and Japanese Characters are most popularly input by typing Latin letters and then converting, probably not.
__________________
Yours, Rubber Duck

Please note that any historic offers over a month old are null and void.
Rubber Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 07:47 PM   #666 (permalink)
Platinum Lifetime Member
No Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 10:58 PM
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 687
DNF$: 1,324


Quote:
Originally Posted by DomainsInc View Post
If idn.idn comes out i think it will end up rendering idn.com,net,org ect obsolete.
idn.com, idn.net, idn.cn, idn.jp etc. most certainly CAN become idn.idn (equal to .com, .net, .jp etc.). This is all in the pipeline, it will be up to Verisign and the various registries if they choose to do this.

Some speculate they will offer BOTH idn.com, etc. etc. aliased to their equivalents as idn.idn. Some suggest they might even get the idea to allow you to buy one, or both for an extra registration fee.

The information regaring .com etc., and the provided protection by ICANN against any new "confusingly similar" extensions to anything already existing are all addressed in the ICANN and GNSO documents and working papers.

http://public.icann.org/files/NewgTL...tz_Dubai08.pdf
Quote: New gtld's "must not cause string confusion"

idn.com, idn.cn, idn.jp etc. should all stay on the top of the food chain, perhaps morphing to idn.idn at some point. The news of (new) idn.idn has been good publicity, especially with Russian idns which now are getting some nice type in traffic.

Last edited by bwhhisc; 04-25-2008 at 09:26 PM..
bwhhisc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IDNs...Where You Stand on These? DryHeat IDN Registration 53 02-07-2006 11:18 AM
IDNs and IE7 and the Coming Storm New News Article. Sarcle Domain Name News 2 02-06-2006 12:45 AM
Idn's to break up internet? Sarcle Domain Name News 74 12-16-2005 03:46 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.
Copyright @2001-2009 DNForum.com