Why wouldn't they? ICANN gets the $$$. That's what this whole thing is about. From what I have read so far, there would be an auction if there is more than 1 party interested in a tld.
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Will ICANN permits the sale of the .SEARCH TLD on June 13th?
I don't see any fair way to assign this extension if Google.com, Bing.com, and Yahoo.com all apply for
this TLD at the same time. Is there something in the ICANN docs that prevent generic TLD's
similar to .SEARCH (say .INSURANCE) from being released? Does anyone know how the selection
process works?
Last edited by GO1; 05-31-2012 at 08:09 PM.
Why wouldn't they? ICANN gets the $$$. That's what this whole thing is about. From what I have read so far, there would be an auction if there is more than 1 party interested in a tld.
auction is the only fair way of doing it. keep in mind - just because there are going to be over 1,000 new extensions...doesn't mean anyone will use them. The general public barely use or even know about the available ones now.
For Sale: SoSave.com Logoh !com PrizeBin.com WEBSITEY.com Parkable.com WeRebate.com DoResume.com Resaver.com
Many of the TLD's ICANN put out there were quite useless.
But from a users perspective, think about how easy it will be to type simply . s e a r c h (no a 2nd level name)
Technically . s e a r c h (only) should resolve directly to the owner of the TLD and they will display
ads and products for sale. Now If the search site is as good or better than the big three, well who knows what will happen?
ZUCK should buy this TLD.
Bookmarks