View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
View Friends
View Blog Entries
Reply With QuoteLooks cool Adam, but contains this code:
google_page_url = "http://www.ericgiguere.com/about/google-adsense-tips.html" ;
Mistake? Thanks.
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!
email sent!Originally Posted by aZooZa
-=DCG=-
Looks cool Adam, but contains this code:
google_page_url = "http://www.ericgiguere.com/about/google-adsense-tips.html" ;
Mistake? Thanks.
No mistake, just testing for layout, what do you think of the setup and the changes with content?
I will make another one after lunch without the adsense_url link.
-=DCG=-
Absolutely great! You wouldn't like to do 500 more for me would you? I'm in the UK so may miss you later today, but will be back tomorrow for sure.
Will we be seeing this tool soon?
Re: try www.makingadsense.com
What happened to the site, all I get is coming soon page?
Would greatly appreciate keeping me in the loop on the newest template and how DCG has something even better than the page referral URL (something I was always afraid to implement myself).
P.S. Find it amazing anything could be superior to a Referring to Page URL code to an outside well targeted website, IMO an excellent solution to poor targeting and something G should in fact allow all trusted publishers to use, rather than be against the TOS at it is.
P.S. The only thing I can think of now as being better would be a long list of adword keywords which publishers can pick and choose from for their adsense.
Last edited by trader; 03-05-2005 at 11:19 AM. Reason: ps and a few edits
The URL was given to Adam purely as a test for the new version of the template system. He elected to keep the resultant site URL private, which I did. MakingAdSense.com has no code yet.
I'm guessing that the new template system will not be AdSense-based.
I'm also sick to death of Google's pathetic AdSense spider.
Later.
Thanks but how can the url be tested if it does not resolve to a website? Perhaps I am missing something in the thread.
Do you think the new system will be based on Affiliate Sensor?
The new script will definitely be adsense based.
-=DCG=-
The demo was hosted on his server so the URL was inconsequential. The keyword was the important thing.
Adam, what's the deal with braids.com and penpals.com? Are you getting better results now without the adsense templates there?
The URL is not inconsequential? G uses the URL keywords and word parsing as one of the things it looks at when the site is spidered by goooglebot and mediapartners bot both to target the ads and index the site.
Do a G search for some keywords and you will see the URL or part of the URL is in boldface type along with words located in the content area, indicating the url helped to a degree.
I also have some multi-word url sites where IMO I rank #1 only because my domain name is the exact same as the search words.
Interesting, I'm going to try it as well.
I understand what you're saying and I know about Google's criteria. The URL was apparently inconsequential in this experiment only - Adam even changed it. You'll get this into context once the next version's released. Hopefully I will too, given that the site code contained a 'google_page_url=' line.
Has anyone here had any problem with the use of these templates (contacts from the Adsense team, etc.)? I am also worried about that part in the Google rules.
Do NOT use the google_page_url code if you want to keep your adsense account. Search for "google_url" elsewhere here in Exclusive.
Azooza,
I will be releasing something shortly that will accomplish the same thing without the adsense url code, so yes pull it.
-=DCG=-
Thanks for the info guys
Re: try www.makingadsense.com
What happened to this one, I still only get a coming soon page?
Yeah, I have the same question.
I would really like to know how many percent higher revenue do you get with the templated AdSense, as opposed to domainsponsor, for example.
penpals.com seems to be linked to Google's Oingo program.
(If your sites generate more than 750,000 page views per month, AdSense for domains is for you)
How does Oingo perform? compared to DomainSponsor?
From what I understand, oingo will pay you 50% of the ad revenue.
And I suppose domainsponsor, who has a partnership with Google (oingo?) will give you 25% of the revenue.
Has anyone made a move from DS to Oingo?? ... this could result in a quick doubling of one's revenue. :santa:
<< PM me if you are selling:
a) expired/type-in domains with traffic
b) large developed sites, with massive traffic
Still waiting on the new template system -- I wonder if it might now be something to do with an amalgamation with Adam's Oingo account for us poor persons without the required imps -- just a stab in the dark...
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks